Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br /> <br />EXTRACT OF MINtl~S OF MEETING OF THE <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL ~F ~HE CITy OF ROSEVILLE <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of th9 <br />City Council of L;e City of Roseville, Cour.ty of Ramsey, <br />Minnesota was du'y held on the 14th day of June, 1993, at 7:30 <br />p.m. <br /> <br />The foll~wing members were present: <br />Goedeke, Maschka, Cushman, p, Johnson. and V. Johnso~, <br /> <br />and the foll,)winq were abser.t: <br />None. <br /> <br />Member Mas:::hka <br />and moved its adoption. <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. ~9S3 <br /> <br />introduced the following resolution <br /> <br />A CORRECTIVE RESOLL~ION RECO~XNDING VACATION OF A <br />PORTION OF THE WEST SNELLI~jG A ';ENUE FRONTAGE RO_I\D <br /> <br />WHEREAS, after two weeks published and posted notice, the City <br />Council held a public heQring on May 26, 1992, to determine <br />whether or not said street in the city of Roseville stould be <br />vacated; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, it appeared that by reason the frontage road was not <br />needed H: would ;)e b~neficial to the public ~,nterest to recommend <br />vacating the street; and <br /> <br />~EREAS, the City Council did, on May 26, 1992, pursuant to <br />'solut,ion No. S802, vacate said frontage road; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, it was subseauentlv ,e~rnpd th~t th~re w~s an e~=cr in <br />the legal descript.ion "in sald ResolutioT, No. 88'>2; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the city Council now herp.by desires ~o ~orrect said <br />e~roneous legal description by adopting a crrrective resolution <br />with the c~mplete and correct le~ 1 descL1ptioni <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the city Council of the City <br />of Roseville hereby recom;",ends vacat:ing the public street over <br />the property described as follo~s: <br /> <br />2" ,o.os <br /> <br />