My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_1110
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_1110
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/9/2014 6:16:46 PM
Creation date
12/9/2014 6:15:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/10/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,November 10, 2014 <br /> Page 16 <br /> pick-up program, and other options to reduce services, raise fees or look for part- <br /> nership opportunities outside of the community to reduce expenditures or increase <br /> revenue sources. <br /> Mayor Roe noted past discussions about revenue options used by other communi- <br /> ties, such as a utility franchise fee for electricity, which Roseville had discussed in <br /> the past but chose not to pursue at that time. Mayor Roe noted that such options <br /> could address those funding issues as Councilmembers Willmus and McGehee <br /> had brought up; and suggested a need to consider such options on a continuing <br /> basis. <br /> Councilmember Etten referenced staffs discussion in the RCA about the need for <br /> a comprehensive financial analysis for the municipal golf course, and suggested <br /> the need to do so early in 2015 from a program and financial perspective, based <br /> on the looming needs and repair costs pushed deferred in the CIP. Councilmem- <br /> ber Etten suggested that program be looked at in totality to find near and long- <br /> term solutions. <br /> Mayor Roe concurred with Councilmember Etten. <br /> Councilmember McGehee suggested a strategic plan of 5 years in duration to de- <br /> termine priorities going forward, opining that it would give the community an op- <br /> portunity to assist the City Council and weigh in on how those priorities were es- <br /> tablished over that five year term versus a twenty year term. Councilmember <br /> McGehee opined that a robust community discussion on those priorities rarely oc- <br /> curred, and further opined that those priorities may have changed from those <br /> funded in the past, and more inclusiveness was needed in considering priorities. <br /> Councilmember Etten suggested survey questions around that issue as a useful <br /> tool in the next survey to focus and get more useful on priorities. <br /> In addition to reviewing golf course needs and operations, Councilmember <br /> Laliberte suggested it would be beneficial to look at the Park Master Plan now <br /> that Park Renewal Funds have been put in place and moving forward; and wheth- <br /> er there was a need to re-examine the Master Plan to determine if a projected CIP <br /> need in the Park Improvement Plan(PIP) was actually$27.7 million. <br /> On pages 18 —26 of the PIP, Mayor Roe referenced his earlier discussion with Fi- <br /> nance Director Miller and the need to itemize that similar to other functions (e.g. <br /> park maintenance) and showing the various vehicles and their replacement cycle. <br /> Mayor Roe opined that it would be helpful and tie in with the Master Plan itself <br /> for future discussions. Mayor Roe also referenced the $500,000 listed for new <br /> pathway construction, and expressed his discomfort in accepting it as listed at <br /> $9.5 million over the nineteen years of the plan before a plan and funding mech- <br /> anism with council support had been identified. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.