My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_1110
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_1110
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/9/2014 6:16:46 PM
Creation date
12/9/2014 6:15:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/10/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,November 10, 2014 <br /> Page 22 <br /> Mayor Roe noted, at the last NSCC meeting, another potential cable provider had <br /> expressed interest in looking at a franchise in this area, noting that the GreatLand <br /> Connections franchise was not exclusive and that interest under review by the <br /> NSCC over the next few months. <br /> e. Adopt an Ordinance Amending Roseville City Code, Section 1011.11.E, <br /> Parking Lot Lighting <br /> City Planner Paschke briefly reviewed the requested ordinance text amendment <br /> found through practical application and as detailed in the RCA dated November <br /> 10, 2014. Mr. Paschke clarified that, following the Planning Commission public <br /> hearing and discussion, along with their recommendation for action to the City <br /> Council, in staff's subsequent analysis, and discussion with lighting consultants, <br /> staff was recommending the better approach to text amendments, as outlined in <br /> lines 69—77 of the RCA, removing redundancies and removing potential ambigu- <br /> ities between the two code sections (Attachment C). <br /> Councilmember Willmus questioned if the issue should return to the Planning <br /> Commission for further review before Council action since it was different than <br /> their initial recommendation. <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that the recommended changes by staff were <br /> minor enough that it didn't need to return to the Planning Commission. However, <br /> for consistency purposes, Councilmember McGehee asked that staff reference a <br /> "1.0 foot candle" (line 33). <br /> McGehee moved, Etten seconded, enactment of Ordinance No. 1471 (Attachment <br /> C) entitled, "An Ordinance Amending Selected Text of Roseville Zoning Code, <br /> Title 10;" using staff's alternate language as recommended; and using the 1.0 <br /> foot candle reference as noted. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Willmus, Etten, McGehee, Laliberte, and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> f. Adopt an Ordinance Approving Roseville Zoning Code, Section 1009.07, <br /> Text Amendment—Developer Open House Meetings <br /> City Planner Paschke briefly reviewed the requested ordinance text amendment <br /> found through practical application and as detailed in the RCA dated November <br /> 10, 2014. <br /> Councilmember Etten thanked staff for bringing these good improvements for- <br /> ward and seeking to further include the public in meaningful ways. For consider- <br /> ation in future revisions, Councilmember Etten suggested changes to the open <br /> house invitations related to what information should be included and how to draft <br /> language for richer understanding by the public beyond typical planning and de- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.