My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_1110
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_1110
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/9/2014 6:16:46 PM
Creation date
12/9/2014 6:15:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/10/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,November 10, 2014 <br /> Page 8 <br /> City Manager Trudgeon advised that staff hadn't had direct conversations with <br /> the RVA at this point beyond their involvement in communications group discus- <br /> sion; and would need further discussion with the RVA as to their interest in <br /> changing their current tagline. <br /> Mayor Roe agreed that the RVA needed to be involved in the discussion, espe- <br /> cially with the tagline, opining that what they need may influence what was done <br /> for the entire organization. <br /> Communications Manager Bowman stated that he viewed the RVA separately as <br /> a different marketing niche, even though part of the City, and noted the effective- <br /> ness of the current RVA brand. <br /> Councilmember Willmus questioned how staff proposed to address and/or involve <br /> area foundations (e.g. Central Park Foundation); with Mr. Bowman responding <br /> that this type of feedback was all part of what a consultant would use to deliver <br /> their end suggestion. <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that the RVA had done an excellent job of mar- <br /> keting Roseville with their own materials and tagline. However, Councilmember <br /> McGehee noted that other areas (e.g. Harriet Alexandria Nature Center, OVAL, <br /> etc.) needed unifying. Councilmember McGehee questioned the need to include <br /> Roseville University or the Central Park Foundation, when those things were <br /> community-specific, not seeking a broader draw. Councilmember McGehee <br /> opined that she would like to see things pared down, using Councilmember <br /> Laliberte's idea as a starting point. <br /> Given the current messaging that was effective, and the success of the RVA's <br /> marketing efforts, Councilmember Laliberte opined that the end recommendation <br /> after this process may be a reiteration of the current tagline. Therefore, Coun- <br /> cilmember Laliberte reiterated her suggestion that a great deal of money not be <br /> spent, even though she thought the proposed $15,000 cost was well within the <br /> private marketplace costs, she was not sure if it was a good use of taxpayer dollars <br /> if it simply ended up a spin-off of what was already used. Councilmember <br /> Laliberte noted that the City of Minneapolis had used the Minneapolis College of <br /> Art and Design for several projects, as well as other major corporations and non- <br /> profits; and opined that they were a very credible organization. <br /> Communications Manager Bowman advised that he had a call into their repre- <br /> sentatives, and expressed his interest in determining their level of expertise. <br /> However, Mr. Bowman did express some hesitation in how and which students <br /> would be assigned and needed further information on how the process worked. <br /> Mr. Bowman noted that the one consultant staff had spoken with had experience <br /> in such a process with over sixty municipalities to-date. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.