My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_1117
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_1117
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2015 4:31:05 PM
Creation date
12/9/2014 6:22:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/17/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,November 17,2014 <br /> Page 8 <br /> However, Councilmember McGehee opined that the Commission had not come to <br /> ask about any of that and had therefore failed to set priorities. Councilmember <br /> McGehee agreed with Mayor Roe's comments about not being interested in tak- <br /> ing on more major financial issues, since funds were not available to pursue eve- <br /> rything. Councilmember McGehee reiterated her disappointment that funds were <br /> not used to build a nice club house for the community; and she was unsure what <br /> to do about it now. Councilmember McGehee further opined that, if the Commis- <br /> sion could make a plan on how to fund a new club house, perhaps peoples could <br /> contribute to make a good club and if offering lunches, perhaps it could draw a <br /> nice golfing clientele, similar to other gathering buildings, and perhaps offer <br /> cross-country skiing during winter months. Councilmember McGehee expressed <br /> her interest in seeing the Commission come up with such a plan. <br /> Mayor Roe clarified that Cedarholm was not a Parks & Recreation Commission <br /> golf course, but belonged to the community, and therefore it wasn't up to the <br /> Commission to figure everything out. Mayor Roe expressed his disappointment <br /> with Councilmember McGehee's attempts at lecturing the Commission, opining <br /> that if everything she thought the Park Renewal bonds should have been used for <br /> was done, the bonds would have been spent something like three times over. <br /> Mayor Roe further clarified that it had been known from the onset that the Parks <br /> Renewal Program was only a partial solution for the community, and it had been <br /> determined to address some things first, and noted that Cedarholm and the Skat- <br /> ing Center had not been excluded or not recognized as needing work. Mayor Roe <br /> opined that, at this point, to second guess how the bond funds should have been <br /> spent and reprioritizing the decision-making was futile, and Councilmember <br /> McGeheeneeded to move past that mentality. <br /> Councilmember Etten stated that he was looking for some sense from the Com- <br /> mission of what a replacement would be, since there were multiple ways to re- <br /> place it as well as multiple uses it could serve. Councilmember Etten questioned <br /> whether renovating the current building had validity, but requested information <br /> from the Commission on that option: and whether to consider a higher-end club <br /> house or a renovated club house, and pros and cons, and rough costs, for either <br /> choice. Councilmember Etten further expressed his interest in looking at how the <br /> enterprise could enhance revenues outside of golf, such as seeking revenue <br /> sources for that space. While replacing the roof and other major repairs have <br /> been on the CIP for several years, Councilmember Etten asked that those major <br /> repairs over $20,000 not be considered until a more robust community discussion <br /> is held. Councilmember Etten stated that he was in agreement with Mayor Roe's <br /> comments, and opined that there had been significant opportunities for the City <br /> Council, the community and other interested parties to provide input for the Park <br /> Renewal Program components, with choices and priorities made after significant <br /> discussion. Councilmember Etten opined that to bring this issue up repeatedly af- <br /> ter 3-4 years of that decision having been made was not helpful to the community <br /> nor did it improve the future of the community in any way. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.