My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03347
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3300
>
pf_03347
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 1:51:23 PM
Creation date
4/12/2005 10:55:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3347
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
1897 SHADY BEACH AVE N
Applicant
BRADLEY HOFF
Status
Approved
PIN
132923410018
Date Final City Council Action
8/19/2002
Date Final Planning Commission Action
11/14/2001
Planning Files - Resolution #
10029
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
196
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />July 25, 1990 <br /> <br />Ci ty of Raseville <br />2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Raseville, MR 55113 <br /> <br />City Council Members, <br /> <br />Bnclo.ed, you will find a site plan of the exi.ting driveway and <br />garage a. they are now, .ome photographs of the property as it is <br />now, and a propo.ed .ite plan. The purpo.e of including <br />photographs i. to try and show the nine foot elevation of the lot. <br /> <br />As you can s.., my existing driveway is not only steep and in need <br />of repair, half of the driveway is not on my property. <br /> <br />I am asking you, the Council, to allow me to build a garage and <br />drivewaI as shown in the proposed site plan. The variance tor the <br />garage s due to the fact of not being able or practical to put <br />the garage on the water .ide of the lot, which is considered the <br />backyard. The variance for the driveway, being thr.. feet off the <br />property instead of five feet, would allow a wider swing into the <br />front doors of the garage. <br /> <br />Also shown in the proposed site plan are retaining walls. This <br />would become necessary, as I would like to dig down the yard at <br />the point of the garage and driveway levels to llAke a much more <br />gradual approach up the driv8Way. The existing garage is on the <br />property line. I would like to be able to build the new garage at <br />the legal setback of five feet in order to keep the driveway <br />length at the sixty-eight feet, as shown in the propo88d site <br />plan. <br /> <br />Setting the proposed driveway and garage back any closer to the <br />existing house would .-an more digging costs, concrete, and <br />retaining walls. Thus, becoming a financial hardship for .. as I <br />already have five hundred square feet of concrete and fifty feet <br />of multiple-layer retaining walls in the "right of way" area <br />between the .treet and where my lot begins at the top of the hill. <br /> <br />I would appreciate your taking these variances under <br />consideration. <br /> <br />Thank you. <br /> <br />Bradley A. Hoff <br />1897 Shady Beach Avenue <br />Roseville, HI 55113 <br />(612) 488-9900 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.