Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />o Headlight glare <br />o Shiely driveway headlights into his home <br />o No input from neighbors <br />Paragraph 4.3 - C "Code does not address lakeshore property" <br />Paragraph 5.1 - Comprehensive Plan encourages maintaining and improving residential <br />properties. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The Hoff precedent stare decisis citywide implications: <br />1. Use an II-year old building permit to build. <br />2. Do not meet code - get ticketed $2.4 <br />3. Then you go and get a variance. <br />4. Why does the hardship issue arise now? <br /> <br />This sets the precedent citywide, there is no time requirement for competitor of building permits. Build <br />the structure any way you want. If you get ticketed for core, go to the Planning Commission to get <br />retroacti vi ty. <br /> <br />Precedent in: <br />1. Timeliness of construction permit. This is 11 years old. <br />2. The Building Inspector, a City Officer, asked to halt the construction. You proceed anyway. <br />3. The remedy is you go to the Planning Commission to get a variance. You no longer need prior <br />approval on any permit in Roseville. <br /> <br />It's the Hoff Precedent - or the Hoff Argument. <br /> <br />Daniel M. Shiely <br />1901 Shady Beach Avenue <br />Roseville, MN 55113 <br />