Laserfiche WebLink
<br />DOUBLES & FACILITY DESIGN <br /> <br />Doubles, and truck. full trailer vehicles do present a <br />peculiar facility design problem in that the vehicles are <br />seldom backed as a whole. Because of this, space must <br />be left at facilities where they will appear, to be used <br />while separating them and for parking one section of the <br />combination while the other is backed into the dock. It <br />should be noted that when both semitrailers of the <br />doubles vehicle have been backed into the dock, space <br />will still be needed to store the converter dolly. <br /> <br />Doubles are now used throughout the West, and their <br />use is spreading in the Eastern states. The off track char- <br />acteristics of a 65-foot doubles or a 65-foot truck. full <br />trailer are such that off track is actually less than for a <br />55.foot tractor.semitrailer. On some special routes <br />doubles 110 feet long are used. Those vehicles do off- <br />track more than 55.foot tractor-semitrailers. <br /> <br />DESCRIPTION OF SIZE AND <br />TRACK PLOT PROCEDURE <br /> <br />Track Plot Procedure <br /> <br />The methods of determining vehicle maneuverability <br />characteristics presented in Appendix I are, of course, <br />only approximations of actual vehicle performance. <br /> <br />These methods do not, for instance, allow for wheel slip, <br />and assume there are no irregularities in the roadway <br />which would affect vehicle track. It has also been <br />assumed that the steering wheels are moved from one <br />position to another instantaneously and, hence, that the <br />vehicle enters a turn with the steering wheels turned to <br />their maximum, negotiates the turn with the wheels <br />turned to their maximum, and leaves the turn with the <br />wheels directed straight ahead. In practice, of course, the <br />wheels are turned continually as the vehicle enters, <br />negotiates and leaves the curve. <br /> <br />Because of the assumptions made, and error inherent <br />in the incremental advance method used with it, track <br />plots obtained using the procedure described in <br />Appendix I should not be considered to represent the <br />actual path a vehicle will follow. A result obtained using <br />the procedure, therefore, should not be construed to be <br />a standard. Generally. error introduced by the as. <br />sumptions on which it is based results in the final plot <br />being larger than the actual track. <br /> <br />A comparison of maximum track obtained using the <br />method presented in Appendix I was made with that <br />determined by (1) SAE J695 (1971 SAE Handbook), <br />and (2) SAE J695a (1973 SAE Handbook). The track <br />obtained for 900 and 2700 turns was compared with that <br />from the Stevens, Tignor and LoJacono method given in <br />SAE paper 650721. The results of those comparisons are <br />shown in the following chart. <br /> <br />Off-track For 55 foot Tractor-Semitrailer Shown on Page 26 <br />of APPENDIX I As Calculated By Several Methods <br /> <br />Method <br /> <br />SAE J695a <br />1973 SAE Handbook <br /> <br />SAE 1695 <br />1971 SAE Handbook <br /> <br />APPENDIX I <br />Procedure <br /> <br />SAE Paper <br />650721 <br /> <br />Maximum off-track <br /> <br />16.3' <br /> <br />21.9' <br /> <br />23.S' <br /> <br />900 off-track <br /> <br />2700 off-track <br /> <br />16 ' <br /> <br />14.9' <br /> <br />23.2' <br /> <br />21 ' <br /> <br />Vehicle size procedure <br /> <br />The size determination procedure. as the track plot <br />procedure. will tend to produce a final track plot which <br />is slightly larger than would actually occur. <br /> <br />The vehicle size determination procedure presented In <br />Appendix I is almost opposite the procedure a truck <br />operator uses when he determines the length of a vehicle <br />he is going to order. For the procedure presented in <br />Appendix I, weight is given and length is determined. The <br />truck operator wiII usually take vehicle length and from' <br />that determine the weight which can be carried. The <br />reason [or the difference in approach to the problem of <br />vehicle length is basically that an architect trying to find <br /> <br />the vehicle requiring the most space to maneuver and an <br />operator developing the size of vehicle he needs for his <br />business have two different problems and have different <br />data available for use in solving their problems. <br /> <br />The architect, in solving his problems, knows he <br />wants to find the vehicle taking the most space for <br />maneuvering. The only information he has available to <br />him for solving that problem is state law regulating size <br />and weight. An operator, in setting up the vehicle he is <br />going to operate, is concerned over the space needed for <br />its maneuvering and is also concerned in obtaining a <br />vehicle of proper size (neither larger nor smaller than <br />necessary) to handle the freight he will haul. The opera- <br />tor. in solving his problem, has available to him state <br />laws for size and weight, and information from vehicle <br /> <br />3 <br />