Laserfiche WebLink
<br />DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSSION MINUTES <br /> <br />OCTOBER, 02, 2002 <br /> <br />e. Planning File 3459: Request by the City of Roseville to consider amended text in the <br />B-6 Business Park District (Section 1005.07) pertaining to pre-existing non-conforming <br />uses. <br /> <br />Chair Duncan opened the hearing and request City Planner Thomas Paschke provide a summary <br />ofthe project report dated October 2,2002. <br /> <br />Dennis Welsch informed the Commission that property owners, Northco Real Estate, St Paul <br />Properties, Hagen, and Reco/Regan requested that the City Council/Planning Commission <br />discuss the merits of either: <br /> <br />1) not rezoning any Twin Lakes land to B-6 until a redevelopment proposal is in hand, or <br /> <br />2) expanding the "pre-existing, nonconforming use" text definition and exceptions for their land <br />uses and buildings within the proposed Twin Lakes "B-6" rezoning area. <br /> <br />The applicants' purpose would be to allow "pre-existing, nonconforming lots, uses and <br />structures" to expand, intensify, or change to another "nonconforming" use in order to stabilize <br />the lease and cash flow as well as retain or expand existing and new tenants. <br /> <br />In July 2002, the City Council requested that the Planning Commission review the case and <br />provide further recommendations regarding the "pre-existing non conforming lots, uses and <br />structures". Since July the applicants have been working with staff and the City Attorney to <br />develop more explicit language dealing with the "non-conforming use" issue. At the same time <br />they have pointed out other areas in the ordinance where clarification was necessary. Attached <br />are their proposals. <br /> <br />Dave Sellegrin, attorney representing the property owners, stated the owners support the staff <br />proposal to table text changes for attorney review, table indefinitely the B-6 map rezoning until <br />property owners come forth; and staff to develop a policy explaining the procedure for review of <br />pre-existing non-conforming uses. <br /> <br />Chair Duncan closed the hearing. <br /> <br />Motion: Member Pepper moved, seconded by Member Bakeman, to recommend <br />Any Planning Commission recommendation on language changes to the B-6 zoning district be <br />tabled until November 4, 2002, and that the City Attorney and staff are to retain the existing pre- <br />existing, nonconformity language, and further that the City Attorney and staff are to prepare <br />specific clarification language for Section 1005.07 A and B regarding "permitted uses and <br />ancillary uses". <br /> <br />Member Traynor stated he will support the motion, change has been planned for 15 years, but the <br />City must get moving on the site. The market will still drive the development on the site and that <br />the City should encourage redevelopment of Twin Lakes. <br /> <br />PF3359-RCA(1 02102) Page 9 of 13 <br />