Laserfiche WebLink
<br />d. Recommend retaining the existing language (i.e.,do nothing), allow existing <br />language to remain. <br />e. No changes at this time, allowing time for the market to recover: <br />1. Recommend retaining the existing language (do nothing to <br />change the Code language for "B-6" districts). <br />2. Recommend tabling indefinitely (do nothing) to not approve <br />the zoning map amendments from 1-1,1-2, and B-1 and B-4, <br />which are currently awaiting a second reading at the City <br />Council level. <br /> <br />4.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: <br /> <br />The Planning staff recommends "Option 3.2e", making no changes at this time to <br />the text or the map, recognizing that the development and leasing market is in a <br />slow period, and that this area (Twin Lakes) might best be served by having each <br />proposal for a parcel or group of parcels heard, reviewed, and decided upon <br />individually in the future by each developer and/or the city. <br /> <br />Staff also recommends preparation of an additional policy document that more <br />clearly explains the pre-existing, nonconforming building and land use review <br />procedure. <br /> <br />5.0 SUGGESTED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: <br /> <br />By motion... <br /> <br />1. Table until November 4, 2002, any Planning Commission recommendation on <br />language changes to the B-6 zoning district, instructing the City Attorney and staff to <br />retain the existing pre-existing, nonconformity language, and request the City Attorney <br />and staff to prepare specific clarification language for Section 1005.07 A and B regarding <br />"permitted uses and ancillary uses". <br /> <br />2. Recommend to the Council to table indefinitely the City's proposal to rezone all <br />Twin Lakes parcels from I-I, 1-2, and B-1 and B-4 to B-6, thus allowing for individual <br />parcel-by parcel "B-6" rezoning requests consistent with the Twin Lakes Master Plan as <br />amended and current at the time of the rezoning request. <br /> <br />3. Request the staff to develop a policy document which explains the pre-existing, <br />nonconforming building and land use review procedure. <br /> <br />Prepared by: Thomas Paschke (490-2236) and Dennis Welsch (490-2232) <br /> <br />Attachment: Proposed Ordinance. 60-day review not applicable. <br /> <br />PF3359 - PF3359-RPCA(1 00202) Page 4 of 9 <br />