My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-11-18_HRA_Agenda_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Housing Redevelopment Authority
>
Agendas and Packets
>
2014
>
2014-11-18_HRA_Agenda_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/22/2014 11:29:18 AM
Creation date
12/22/2014 11:29:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Housing Redevelopment Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HRA Meeting <br />Minutes – Tuesday, October 21, 2014 <br />Page 8 <br />1 <br />Member Majerus questioned, as the HRA moved forward, did it want to compete in the <br />2 <br />marketplace or be available to areas that the market didn’t address. <br />3 <br />4 <br />Chair Maschka opined that this was a good point; however, he wanted to see the $600,000 <br />5 <br />moving; and since it wasn’t doing so, needed to determine why not. <br />6 <br />7 <br />Ms. Kelsey admitted that she didn’t know if the HRA had marketed or advertised as much as <br />8 <br />pre-construction management, since in the past Welcome Packets had been sent out, but they <br />9 <br />were no longer available and were in process to determine a new design or further direction <br />10 <br />from the City Council on the tagline. Therefore, Ms. Kelsey cautioned the HRA that staff had <br />11 <br />not been doing normal outreach currently as they had done in the past. <br />12 <br />13 <br />Member Lee questioned if people thinking about homeownership were being marketed to, <br />14 <br />beyond the first time homebuyers seminar being held at the library. <br />15 <br />16 <br />Ms. Kelsey advised that, with the information technology now available and diversification in <br />17 <br />the marketplace, area realtors – beyond local Roseville realtors – were very aware of loan <br />18 <br />programs and homebuyer information and available rehabilitation programs. <br />19 <br />20 <br />Member Masche suggested comparing other first-ring cities (e.g. St. Louis Park) to see the <br />21 <br />maximum number of their loan programs. <br />22 <br />23 <br />Ms. Malrick advised that rebates were popular in 2008, but the money made available by the <br />24 <br />Metropolitan Council had run out, even though some cities had set aside those funds, not as a <br />25 <br />revolving loan fund, but to provide another option (e.g. Crystal, Robbinsdale, etc.), and were <br />26 <br />offered as part of the initial stimulus deals and tax credits. <br />27 <br />28 <br />Chair Maschka thanked Ms. Malrick for her attendance and information. <br />29 <br />30 <br />b.Authorize Contract with ChandleThinks <br />31 <br />32 <br />10.Information Reports and Other Business (Verbal Reports by Staff and Board Members) <br />33 <br />34 <br />a.Roseville Business Exchange <br />35 <br />Ms. Kelsey announced the Roseville Business Exchange, held the fourth Wednesday of each <br />36 <br />month, with the next one being tomorrow; and invited HRA members to attend these <br />37 <br />opportunities to get to know business leaders in the community. <br />38 <br />39 <br />Ms. Kelsey advised that the 1840 Hamline Avenue property had closed last week, so activity <br />40 <br />should be starting soon on the site. Ms. Kelsey noted that the previous home’s value was less <br />41 <br />than $130,000, and the new home’s value was anticipated at $420,000, also increasing the tax <br />42 <br />revenue for the City, as previously discussed during Mr. Bilotta’s presentation. However, Ms. <br />43 <br />Kelsey did note that none of the homes sold and recuperated to-date in the 2000 program had <br />44 <br />recovered the HRA’s cost for demolition. <br />45 <br />46 <br />Chair Maschka suggested a discussion point going forward needed to be incorporating <br />47 <br />recovery of demolition costs in the criteria for the selection process. <br />48 <br />49 <br />11. Adjournment <br />50 <br />Chair Maschka alerted Vice Chair Lee that he would be unavailable for the November 10, 2014 joint <br />51 <br />meeting with the City Council. <br />52 <br />53 <br />The meeting was adjourned at approximately 7:06 p.m. <br />54 <br />55 <br />Joint Meeting with City Council: November 10, 2014 at 6:00 p.m. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.