My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03383
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3300
>
pf_03383
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 1:57:24 PM
Creation date
6/3/2005 2:54:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3383
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
1897 Shady Beach Avenue No.
Project Name
Hoff, Bradley
Applicant
Hoff, Bradley
Status
Approved
PIN
132923410018
Date Final City Council Action
8/19/2002
Planning Files - Resolution #
10029
Additional Information
6 1/2 foot fence in front yard
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />DRAFT MINUTE EXCERPTS <br />NOVEMBER 14, 2001 PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />6. a. Planning File 3347: A request by Brad Hoff for a variance to Section 10 12.02B2 of the <br />Roseville City Code to allow a fence greater than 48 inches high in the front yard of property <br />located at 1897 Shady Beach Avenue. <br /> <br />Chair John Rhody opened the hearing and requested staff to provide a verbal summary of the <br />project report dated November 14, 2001. <br /> <br />Thomas Paschke explained the request; the previous pre-existing non-conforming wood fence; <br />the existing vinyl fence; and the City Code allowance of 48" tall in a front yard. He added that <br />the existing fence is an estimated 65' from the property line to the front of the house. The City <br />has no ordinance related to fences adjacent to shorelines. The City Code applies in this case. <br /> <br />Thomas Paschke suggested the request is reasonable and could meet requirements for hardship. <br />Staff recommended approval of the variance. <br /> <br />Member Olson asked for details of the front property and fence height in that area. <br /> <br />The applicant, Robert Hoff, answered questions. <br /> <br />Member Cunningham asked if there was a concern about business hours within the garage. Is <br />there a business in the garage? (no). Member Cunningham asked for details of the variance <br />approved in 1990. Member Cunningham asked about details of window privacy hardships, along <br />the front ( east side) of the house. <br /> <br />Member Olson asked for details of the old fence which was replaced. The post is not considered <br />part of the height; the new fence rails are approximately six feet. The maintenance free single <br />fence reduces need for access to neighbor's yard. <br /> <br />Member Cunningham asked for details of the fence extension to the lakeshore from a point 40 <br />feet to the shore. Why is there a need for fencing to the lake? (to protect investment). <br /> <br />Roger Hess, 1913 Shady Beach Road, asked for clarification of front side of house (street side). <br />Mr. Hess asked for details of the fence built today (11114/01) on south side of property. <br /> <br />Member Traynor asked Mr. Hess to clarify the length and position of the fence installed <br />November 14th. <br /> <br />Daniel Shiely, 190 I Shady Beach Avenue, asked the Commission to accept a new packet of <br />information. He stated that he had new infonnation regarding the previous 1990 variance. <br /> <br />Mr. Shiely indicated that there are 14 of 16 property owners (80% of owners) and the Lake <br />McCarron's Lake Association that object to variance. He stated the fence decreases property <br />value and is a "taking without compensation." He asked that the zoning for the site be reviewed <br />and all construction be stopped until the review is complete. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.