My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03383
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3300
>
pf_03383
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 1:57:24 PM
Creation date
6/3/2005 2:54:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3383
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
1897 Shady Beach Avenue No.
Project Name
Hoff, Bradley
Applicant
Hoff, Bradley
Status
Approved
PIN
132923410018
Date Final City Council Action
8/19/2002
Planning Files - Resolution #
10029
Additional Information
6 1/2 foot fence in front yard
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />November 5, 2001 <br /> <br />John Rhody <br />Planning Commission Chairman <br />City of Roseville <br />2660 Civic Center Drive <br /> <br />Roseville, MN 55113 <br /> <br />re: Request for Variance for <br />Brad Hoff - 1897 Shady Beach Ave., Roseville MN 55113 <br />Planning File #3347 <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Chairman: <br /> <br />I am opposed to granting a variance to Mr. Brad Hoff of 1897 Shady Beach Avenue. Fourteen of <br />the sixteen neighboring property owners are opposed to granting this variance as well <br />(attachment # -.i ). That is 87.5% o.lthe neighbors who live vl'ithin 350feet o.l1897 Shady Beach <br />A venue! (exhibit # J::J <br /> <br />The fence is question, circa 1990, was built by the previous property owner, Mike Ubel of 1897 <br />Shady Beach Avenue. (I'm not sure of the proper spelling of his name.) The fence was set back <br />from the lake 50 feet and was shorter in height. This new fence is higher than the previous fence <br />built prior to 1990 and runs down to the shoreline. <br /> <br />I am opposed to the fence for the following reasons: <br />@ The fence obstructs my view of the lake. It is a 'taking without compensation'. <br />tI The fence obstructs the sightline of the entire neighborhood. <br />· The fence obstructs the shoreline as well as the lake. <br /> <br />@ The fence decreases the lake aesthetics. <br /> <br />@ The fence decreases property values. <br />@ The fence has a negative environmental impact on the lake itself. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.