Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5.0 REVIEW OF REQUEST: <br /> <br />5.1 Mr. Rudolph and the Viking Racing Pigeon Club seek approval for two variances <br />allowing them to keep both the additional impervious surface area and the shed in its <br />present location (east side of parcel). <br /> <br />5.2 The new shed replaced the dilapidated shed that was recently removed from the site. <br />Since last year, the Community Development Staff has been working with Mr. Rudolph <br />on properly siding the shed, as well as its location. Last week the shed was sided with a <br />maintenance free vinyl siding, but the shed still remains within the required setback. <br /> <br />5.3 The site plan accompanying the permit for the driveway/sidewalk improvements <br />provides details pertaining to the improvements and existing conditions. However, it is <br />not a scaled drawing that would allow Staff to reach a conclusion regarding total <br />impervious coverage. Calculations for impervious coverage are taken from the property <br />line and it is unclear from the drawing where the property lines lies. Further, the width <br />ofthe driveway (angular portion) is not identified to allow verification of an assumed <br />coverage of 34%. <br /> <br /> <br />6.0 STAFF FINDINGS: <br /> <br />5.1 Section 1013.02 states: Where there are practical difficulties or unusual hardships in the <br />way of carrying out the strict letter of the provisions of this code, the city council shall <br />have the power, in a specific case and after notice and public hearings, to vary any such <br />provision in harmony with the general purpose and intent thereof and may impose such <br />additional conditions as it considers necessary so that the public health, safety, and <br />general welfare may be secured and substantial justice done. <br /> <br /> <br />5.2 Under State Statute 462.357, subd. 6 (2) provides authority for the city to "hear requests <br />for variances from the literal provisions of the ordinance in instances where their strict <br />enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the <br />individual property under consideration, and to grant such variances only when it is <br />demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br />ordinance. "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a variance <br />means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due to <br />circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner, and the variance, if <br />granted, will not alter the essential character ofthe locality. Economic considerations <br />alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists <br />under the terms of the ordinance.....The board or governing body as the case may be may <br />impose conditions in the granting of variances to insure compliance and to protect" <br /> <br />5.3 Staff analysis of undue hardship factors is as follows: <br /> <br />A. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls: <br /> <br />PF3393 - RPCA 071002 - Page 3 of5 <br />