Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5.5 The proposed location of the detached garage meets or exceeds all applicable setback <br />requirements for the property and will be located just adjacent to the existing driveway. <br /> <br />5.6 Section 1013.02 requires the applicant to demonstrate a physical hardship and to <br />demonstrate that no practical alternatives exist that would reduce the need for a variance. <br />Variance may be granted where the strict enforcement of the literal provisions of the <br />ordinance would cause "undue hardship". The granting of a variance shall only occur <br />when it can be demonstrated that such an action will be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of the ordinance. <br /> <br />5.7 "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting a variance means the property <br />in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the <br />official controls, the plight of the land owner is due to circumstances unique to the <br />property not created by the land owner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the <br />essential character ofthe locality. Specifically to this request: <br /> <br /> <br />A. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls: Based on the lot size and existing <br />conditions, the Lindholm's could only construct a 331 square foot (estimated) <br />accessory structure before a variance was necessary. This size structure would <br />allow them to construct a similar garage to the existing tuck-under garage, which <br />structure does not address their parking and storage needs. The Community <br />Development Staff has determined that the property cannot be put to a <br />reasonable use under the official controls; that it is reasonable to convert a <br />tuck-under garage into living area and construct a reasonably sized garage <br />with storage. <br /> <br /> <br />B. The plight of the land owner is due to circumstances unique to the property not <br />created by the land owner: The existing tuck-under garage was constructed in an <br />era of different sized vehicles and personal needs. Today, with a growing family <br />and larger vehicles, the attached garage cannot serve the Lindholm's needs. The <br />Community Development Staff has determined that there are unique <br />circumstances present, not created by the current owner, to warrant <br />granting a variance. The only location for a detached garage is in the rear <br />yard, requiring an extended paved driveway. Further, staff views this <br />variance request as an opportunity to invest and create more quality living <br />space in the existing dwelling unit while removing fumes and/or noxious <br />vehicle odors from the dwelling unit. <br /> <br /> <br />C. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality: <br />The Community Development Staff has determined that the construction of <br />a detached accessory building to meet the vehicle and personal storage need <br />of the resident will not alter the essential character or the locality, nor <br />adversely affect the public health, safety, or general welfare, of the city or <br />adjacent properties. The garage is tastefully designed to fit into the <br />neighborhood character established in the early 1960's. <br /> <br />PF3399 - ReA 061702 - Page 3 of 5 <br />