Laserfiche WebLink
<br />WHEREAS, to clarify records and for financial reasons, Northco Real Estate, the current <br />owner, and current tenant Clark Brothers Transfer, have requested the City provide reaffirmation <br />of the previously approved special (conditional) use on this site; and, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City of Roseville Planning Commission held the required hearings on <br />this case on June 5, 2002, and after considering the case and public comment, recommended <br />approval of the request, and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the existing usage as a truck terminal on this site is a conditional use within <br />an 1-2 zoning district in Section 1007.03 C4 of the current City Code; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, this site is considered a portion of the Twin Lakes Business Park wherein <br />the long-term future use of this site is designated as Hi- Tech-High Flex, one and two story <br />buildings for office, showroom and laboratory or light manufacturing; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City is considering a rezoning for this site from 1-2 to B-6 (mixed use <br />office park) wherein the aforementioned existing Northco Truck Tennina1 would be classified as <br />a pre-existing, non-confonning use which may continue in use but may not be expanded or <br />intensified. <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby approves of the <br />request for reaffirmation of a Conditional Use Permit (as per Section 1007.03 C4 of the Zoning <br />Code) to allow the current usage to continue (but not expand, intensify or change to another 1-2 <br />use) under the current and future zoning district, whereby Northco (the truck terminal) would <br />become a pre-existing non-conforming use and the truck terminal could remain, as is, until the <br />owner chooses another permitted use. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member <br />Klausing, and upon vote being taken there, the following voted in favor thereof: Kough, Klausing, <br />Schroeder, 11aschka, Kysylyczyn <br />and the following voted against the same: None <br /> <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />