My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03507
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3500
>
pf_03507
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:01:03 PM
Creation date
6/28/2005 11:37:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3507
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
1881 HIGHWAY 36 W
Project Name
BAKERS SQUARE
Applicant
VICORP INC.
Status
Approved
PIN
092923310013
Date Final City Council Action
8/18/2003
Date Final Planning Commission Action
8/6/2003
Additional Information
5' X 15' RESTROOM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due to <br />circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner, and the variance, if <br />granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations <br />alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists <br />under the terms of the ordinance.... The board or governing body as the case may be <br />may impose conditions in the granting of variances to insure compliance and to <br />protect" <br /> <br />5.6 Staff analysis of undue hardship factors is as follows: <br /> <br />A. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls: The Community Development staff <br />has reviewed the existing (immediate) site conditions to determine whether there <br />is a reasonable alternative/solution that warrants positive support for the variance <br />requested. Based on our review of the existing situation of the Bakers Square <br />parcel a five foot two inch variance is required to meet the accessibility codes of <br />the state, staff has concluded that the proposed location, four feet two inches <br />from the property line adjacent east of Bakers Square, is a practical and <br />reasonable solution to the uniqueness of the parcel and would comply with <br />Minnesota's State Accessibility Code. Based on our analysis of the situation the <br />Community Development Staff has determined that the property can be <br />made more hospitable, and can be put to a reasonable use under the official <br />controls, if a variance is granted. <br /> <br />B. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not <br />created by the landowner: When initially constructed the structure met all <br />applicable codes and ordinances, and was constructed at the required side yard <br />setback. However, the accessibility requirements for disabled individuals has <br />been amended a few times over the past five years, making it necessary for Bakers <br />Square to construct a compliant restroom. That being said, Bakers Square has <br />only one reasonable and practical option, construct the restroom adjacent the <br />existing restrooms, five feet two inches into the required side yard setback <br />meeting mandatory State Accessibility Codes. The Community Development <br />Staff has determined that the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances <br />unique to the property not created by the landowner (structure placement <br />prior to code such as the updated regulations in the Minnesota State <br />Accessibility Code). <br /> <br />C. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality: <br />The Community Development Staff has determined that this variance, if <br />granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality, nor adversely <br />affect the public health, safety, or general welfare, of the city or adjacent <br />properties. It simply, complies with state regulations under Minnesota's <br />Accessibility Codes. <br /> <br />PF3507 - ReA 081803- Page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.