Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5.9 The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions <br />allowed by the official controls: The proposal by Marian and James Korf does not <br />increase the pre-existing non-conforming impervious area on the parcel and its <br />encroachment into the front yard has a minimal impact on the adjacent parcels. Most <br />homes are setback a similar distance, with two homes to the east being setback <br />approximately 32 to 34 feet from the front property line. Without the two variances, this <br />proposal could not be completed. The porch is designed to fit nicely with the home and it <br />has a minimal width (7 feet 6 inches) so that is useable. Because this is the location of <br />the front entry to the home, there are no reasonable or practical alternatives. Community <br />Development Staff has determined that the property can be made more livable and <br />put to a reasonable and practical use under the official controls, if the three <br />variances are granted. <br /> <br />5.10 The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created <br />by the landowner: The Korfs home was built in 1950 prior to the City and its zoning <br />regulations, with all site improvements occurring before the passage of the 1999 <br />impervious coverage requirement. The parcel is slightly smaller than a "standard" <br />residential lot of today. As well, certain neighborhoods were developed with greater front <br />yard setbacks than the City Code established. This area of Burke Avenue in such a <br />neighborhood and any proposed improvements to theses homes (front yard additions) will <br />require either a variance or a setback permit). While City Staff has reviewed the Korf <br />proposal and worked with them on possible options, the Korfs can do little without an <br />approved deviation (variance) from the City Code. The Community Development Staff <br />has determined that the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to <br />the property not created by the landowner (structure placement prior to code, <br />drainage, and topographic issues). <br /> <br />5.11 The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality: The <br />improvement proposed (porch addition extending 7 feet 6 inches into the front yard) is <br />consistent with other homes and parcels from the same era. The Community <br />Development Staff has determined that this variance, if granted, will not alter the <br />essential character of the locality, nor adversely affect the public health, safety, or <br />general welfare, of the city or adjacent properties. <br /> <br />6.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: <br /> <br />6.1 Based on the information provided and the findings in Section 5 of this project report, the <br />Community Development Staff recommends approval of a 575 square foot (5 %) <br />V ARIANCE to Section 1004.01A6 and a 7 foot 6 inch V ARIANCE to Section <br />l004.01E of the Roseville City Code for Marian and James Korf to allow the <br />construction of a front and side porch on to their home at 1047 Burke Avenue, subject to <br />the following conditions: <br /> <br />A. The parcel being limited to an impervious coverage maximum of 3,577 square <br />feet or 35%. <br /> <br />PF3508 - ReA 081803 - Page 4 of 5 <br />