pf_03508 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

1 Excerpt of Draft Minutes from August 6 Planning Commission meeting: 2 h. Planning; File 3508: Request by James and Marian Korffor a variance to 3 Section 1004.01AG (Maximum Total Surface Area) and 4 (Dwelling Dimensions - Front Yard Setback) of the Roseville City Code 5 to allow the installation of a new porch on the front (south) and side (west) 6 of their home at 1407 Burke Avenue W. 7 8 Chairman Jim Mulder opened the hearing and requested City Planner Thomas Paschke to 9 provide a verbal summary of the staff written report dated August 6, 2003. 10 11 Mr. Paschke indicated that Marian and James Korf, 1047 Burke Avenue, were seeking 12 approval ofa variance to Section 1004.01AG (Maximum Total Surface Area) and 13 (Exception) of the Roseville City Code to allow the construction of a porch on 14 to the front (south) and side (west) of their home. 15 16 Thomas Paschke advised that based on the information provided and the findings in 17 Section 5 of the project report dated August 6, 2003, the Planning staff recommends 18 approval ofa 575 square foot (5%) variance to Section 1004.01A6 and a 7 foot 6 inch 19 variance to Section 1004.01E of the Roseville City Code for Marian and James Korfto 20 allow the construction of a front and side porch on to their home at 1047 Burke Avenue, 21 subject to the following conditions: 22 a. The parcel being limited to an impervious coverage maximum of3,577 23 square feet or 35%. 24 b. The porch addition being limited to the size indicated on the submitted 25 plans, including being limited to a 7 foot 6 inch extension on the front 26 (south) of the home and a 5 foot 4 inch extension one the side (west) on 27 the home. 28 c. Gutters and downspouts must be installed along the eves of the porch to 29 direct runoff into the front and side yard of the parcel. 30 d. The review and approval of a building permit must be consistent with the 31 approved plans and variances. 32 33 There were no comments from the applicant. Chair Mulder closed the hearing. 34 35 Motion: Member Stone moved, seconded by Member Bakeman, to recommend 36 approval ofa 575 square foot (5%) variance to Section 1004.01A6 (Maximum Total 37 Surface Area) of the Roseville City Code, based on the findings of Section 5 and 38 conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated August 6, 2003 39 40 Ayes: 5 41 Nays: 0 42 Motion carried. 43 44 Motion: Member Stone moved, seconded by Member Peper, to recommend approval of 45 a 7 foot, 6 inch, variance to Section 1004.01E (Exception) of the Roseville City Code,