My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03512
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3500
>
pf_03512
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2007 3:27:22 PM
Creation date
6/28/2005 1:28:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3512
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
303 SOUTH OWASSO BLVD
Project Name
CHARLES E ANDERSON
Applicant
CHARLES E ANDERSON
Status
Approved
PIN
012923120026
Date Final City Council Action
9/22/2003
Date Final Planning Commission Action
9/3/2003
Planning Files - Resolution #
10145
Additional Information
FENCE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due to <br />circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner, and the variance, if <br />granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations <br />alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists <br />under the terms of the ordinance....The board or governing body as the case may be <br />may impose conditions in the granting of variances to insure compliance and to <br />protect" <br /> <br />5.8 The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use ifused under conditions <br />allowed by the official controls: The Code allows Mr. Santanni to construct attached and <br />detached accessory buildings of989 sq. ft., which size limits Mr. Santanni to either constructing <br />additional house floor area (footprint) or receiving a variance to achieve his desired structure <br />size. However, requiring Mr. Santanni to construct a living area addition in order to gain the <br />necessary footprint size to eliminate the need for a variance seems unreasonable and impractical. <br />Instead, staff supports a reduced accessory building size of 624 square feet that should afford <br />Mr. Santanni the much needed storage space he desires. The Community Development <br />Staff has determined that the property can be made more livable and put to a <br />reasonable and practical use under the official controls, if a variance not to exceed 75 <br />sq. ft. is granted. <br /> <br />5.9 The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created <br />by the landowner: The Santanni's own a home constructed in 1951 on a parcel created in the <br />late 1940's. The parcel is much larger than standard lots of the 1950's as well as today's <br />11,000 sq. ft. size. In addition, most 1950's homes came with small attached single stall <br />garages that have become obsolete with most oftoday's vehicles. The large parcel allows for a <br />significant amount of impervious coverage and a generous rear yard area. However, the home <br />has a modest footprint, limiting the ability to construct additional accessory building space <br />(attached or detached). That being said, there are limited options offered to Mr. Santanni to <br />resolve his storage space needs and desires. The Community Development Staff has <br />determined that the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the <br />property not created by the landowner (modest home on large parcel). <br /> <br />5.10 The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality: Although <br />this neighborhood does not have a standard home/accessory building design, the 624 sq. ft. <br />detached accessory building (as proposed by staff) would be consistent with other parcels in the <br />neighborhood. Further, the proposed structure's design will be compatible with the roof lines of <br />adjacent structures to minimize massing impacts. The Community Development Staff has <br />determined that this 75 foot variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character <br />of the locality, nor adversely affect the public health, safety, or general welfare, of the <br />city or adjacent properties. <br /> <br />6.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: <br /> <br />PF3512 RPCA 090303 - Page 40f5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.