My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03516
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3500
>
pf_03516
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:02:14 PM
Creation date
6/28/2005 2:52:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3516
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
303 S OWASSO BLVD W
Project Name
CHARLES E & TERRANCE H ANDERSON
Applicant
CHARLES E & TERRANCE H ANDERSON
Status
Approved
PIN
012923120026
Date Final City Council Action
9/22/2003
Date Final Planning Commission Action
9/3/2003
Planning Files - Resolution #
10145
Additional Information
FENCE HEIGHT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />1 Mr. Anderson said in 1995 when Owasso Hills began, the deer shifted to Ladyslipper Park. He <br />2 has lost many hybridized, specialized plants to the deer. He said there were three styles of fence <br />3 including a four board fence, a screen fence, and a mesh fence. He explained the new fence <br />4 proposal. He said he talked to neighbors and MN DNR regarding catching the deer. A deer hunt <br />5 would involve many cities in the area. He can find no other method to prevent damage. <br />6 <br />7 Marliss Ustad, 3058 Farmington Ct., adjacent neighbor, said there are so many deer in the area it <br />8 has become difficult to keep the deer away. The fence will divert deer and decrease property <br />9 value of adjacent homes. The wire fence would go on top of the wood fence. <br />10 <br />11 Member Traynor asked if the fence could be screened or beautified. Mr. Anderson said that if the <br />12 deer problem can be solved or removed, he would take the fence down. <br />13 Member Ipsen asked where the fence is current located (around the entire yard). <br />14 <br />15 There being no further public comment, Chair Duncan closed the hearing. <br />16 <br />17 Motion: Member Peper moved, second by Member Bakeman, to recommend <br />18 approval of a fence height Variance to Section 10 l2.02B3 (Side or Rear Yard Only) of the <br />19 Roseville City Code, based on the findings of Section 5 and conditions of Section 6 of the project <br />20 report dated September 3,2003. <br />21 <br />22 Ayes: 7, Bakeman, Peper, Stone, Mulder, Ipsen, Duncan, Traynor <br />23 Nays: 0 <br />24 Motion Carried: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.