Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 Mr. Paschke advised he has received calls from neighbors supporting 1020 s.f.. He stated that <br />2 staff recommends approval of a Conditional Use Permit (garage size) in accordance with Section <br />3 1004.01A4; approval of a 60 sq. ft. Variance (rear yard are) to Section 1004.01A3; and a 470 sq. <br />4 ft. Variance to Section 1004.01A6 (impervious coverage) of the Roseville City Code for Michael <br />5 Davis to allow the construction of a detached accessory building in the rear yard at 2730 Griggs <br />6 Street, subject to the following conditions: <br />7 <br />8 a. A maximum detached accessory building size of 30 ft. by 32 ft. or 960 sq. ft. <br />9 b. A maximum impervious coverage of 3,474 sq. ft. or 34.6%. <br />10 c. A maximum accessory building height of 15 feet to the mid-point of the roof truss. <br />11 d. The detached accessory building being limited to the storage of residential vehicles, <br />12 lawn and garden items, seasonally used recreational vehicles or items (snowmobiles), <br />13 household items, and a dog kennel. <br />14 e. Submittal of a scaled site plan indicating existing and proposed conditions consistent <br />15 with the above variance conditions. <br />16 f. Windows being placed on the north and south building wall to break-up the building <br />1 7 wall. <br />18 g. Gutters installed along the eves of the detached accessory building and directed to the <br />19 parcel's interior yard ( northeast) to reduce impacts to the adj acent residential properties. <br />20 h. The review and approval of a building permit must be consistent with the approved <br />21 plans and variance. <br />22 <br />23 Mr. Davis distributed a garage plan and explained the proposal. The old garage is a 1 Y2 car <br />24 garage, and then it was added to make it a 2 Y2 car garage (shoddy work) which would be tom <br />25 down. The hardship is that he brings a police work car home which must be secured in a <br />26 neighborhood with many cut-through walkers and children The dog kennel would be attached to <br />27 the garage. The police dog has been teased. He asks for room for three cars, two snowmobiles <br />28 and bench/dog house. He will store materials in the garage attic trusses. <br />29 <br />30 Member Traynor asked for clarification on the 30' x 32' garage (960 versus 1020). He asked <br />31 staff what the rational was for reducing size of the garage [(1) mitigation to reduce yard coverage, <br />32 (2) no more than size of garage for three vehicles plus storage]. <br />33 <br />34 Member Mulder asked if the kennel was considered an accessory building (no). <br />35 <br />36 Member Stone asked if a dog kennel has a cover, is it an accessory building (no, but it could be in <br />37 a gray area). <br />38 <br />39 Thomas Paschke said the replacement proposed is near the same size as the existing garage plus <br />40 kennels. A new slab will be created outside the proposed garage. <br />41 <br />42 There being no further public comment, Chair Duncan closed the hearing. <br />43 <br />44 Motion: Member Mulder moved, second by Member Stone, to recommend approval of a <br />45 Conditional Use Permit (960 sq. ft. garage size) based on the findings of Section 5 and conditions <br />46 of Section 6 of the project report dated September 3, 2003. <br />47 <br />48 Ayes: 7, Bakeman, Peper, Stone, Mulder, Ipsen, Duncan, Traynoru49 Nays: 0 <br />50 Motion carried 7-0. <br />51 <br />