Laserfiche WebLink
<br />or other paver), the total impervious surface on a residential lot or parcel shall not <br />exceed 30% of the total lot or parcel size." The Davis parcel is 10,013 square feet in size, <br />affording 3,002 square feet of impervious coverage. <br />5.3 Built before the 30% surface coverage requirement, the existing improvements (principal <br />structure - 1,091 sq ft., driveway - 1,423 sq. ft., detached garage 572 sq. ft.) exceed the <br />requirement ofthe Code by 82 square feet. <br /> <br />5.4 Section 1004.01A4 established the criteria forreviewing conditional use permits. In the case of <br />the subject request, the review considers specific impacts the proposed 1,020 sq. ft accessory <br />building creates. Said criteria are listed below: <br /> <br />a. Impact on traffic <br /> <br />b. Impacts on parks, streets and other public facilities <br /> <br />c. Compatibility of the site plan, internal circulation, landscaping and structure with <br /> <br />contiguous properties <br /> <br />d. Impact of the use on market value of contiguous properties <br /> <br />e. Impact on the general public health, safety and welfare <br /> <br />f Compatibility with the City's Comprehensive Plan <br /> <br />5.5 The City Planner has reviewed the development proposal with regard to the criteria in Section <br />1013.0 I.D (Conditional Use Permit) of the Roseville Zoning Ordinance and has concluded the <br />proposal meets these criteria. Specifically, a detached accessory building is a permitted use in <br />an R-l District. The proposed detached garage will not create additional traffic or the need for <br />additional public facilities. With proper exterior building treatment, drainage, and landscaping, <br />the building will not have an impact on surrounding property or values. There appears to be no <br />impact on general health, safety, and public welfare. In addition, the project complies with the <br />Comprehensive Plan designation as low-density residential uses. <br /> <br />5.6 The City Planner has reviewed the development proposal with regard to variance standards and <br />determined that it is difficult to justifY a departure from the strict application of the City Code <br />allowing the applicant to construct the proposed detached 1,020 sq. ft detached accessory <br />building. However, there is justification for reducing the size of the replacement garage to a size <br />closer to the 900 sq. ft rear yard maximum afforded the parcel <br /> <br />5.7 Specifically, a 32 foot by 30 foot (960 sq. ft.) detached accessory building designed with attic <br />trusses would reduce overall impervious coverage by 60 sq. ft. and be nearer to the rear yard <br />allowance, but more importantly, the design would still afford Mr. Davis a three car garage with <br />ample interior storage area for the items indicated. <br /> <br />PF3518 RPCA 090303 - Page 3 of 6 <br />