pf_03532 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

WHEREAS, the proposal seeks to construct a detached accessory building 14 feet from the north property line (comer lot side yard) which requires a 16 foot variance to Section 1007.0- 1A7 (Location) and 1004.02D4 (Side Yard Setback adjacent a Public Street); and WHEREAS, The Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the Peck request on October 1,2003, recommending (6-0) approval of the two variances based on the findings of Section 5 and conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated October 1,2003; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Roseville City Council, to APPROVE a VARIANCE to Section 1004.0 1A 7 and 1004.02D4 of the Roseville City Code for Dianne Peck, 2874 Dellwood Street, subject to the following conditions; 1. The detached accessory building being limited to a size of 24 feet by 26 feet or 624 square feet. The overhead garage door shall face west and the driveway shall be "L" shaped. 2. The detached accessory building being located a minimum of 14 feet from the north property line adjacent to County Road C2 and a minimum of 5 feet from the east property line. 3. The parcel being limited to an impervious coverage of 3,060 square feet. 4. The applicant or contractor locating the parcels property pins and developing a scaled site plan with dimensions for structures and driveway, thus allowing the Community Development Department to verify the parcels impervious coverage. 5. The removal of the existing shed in the northeast comer of the parcel. 6. No parking being allowed within the street side boulevard portion of the driveway. Off-street parking can occur on the parcel, but must occur adjacent to the detached garage. 7. Gutters being placed on the accessory building and directed to the rear yard. 8. The review and approval of a building permit consistent with the approved plans and variance. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Maschka and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Maschka, Klausing, Kough, Schroeder and Kysylyczyn and the following voted against: None WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 2