pf_03536 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

f. A property survey including property lines, existing features and the proposal may be required by the Building Official if adequate measurements cannot be found to establish the limits of the 11 foot encroachment. 7.0 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: 7.1 On February 4,2004, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the Rose variance request. At the hearing a representative for the adjacent (south) property owner addressed the Commission opposing the requested variance. Mr. Berkner (father of the property owner John Berkner) indicated that the encroachment into the front yard would take away privacy, block lake views and decrease the value of his son's home (see attached minutes). 7.2 The Planning Commission voted (5-2) to recommend approval of the 11 foot variance request to Section 1004.02D4 02D4 (side yard adjacent a street) of the Roseville City Code to allow the construction of a 14 foot by 14 foot porch and 14 foot by 10 foot deck on to the west side of the principal structure to be placed 19 feet from the property line for Kara Rose, 998 Brooks Avenue, based on the findings of Section 5 and conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated February 4, 2004. 8.0 SUGGESTED CITY COUNCIL ACTION: 8.1 ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN 11 foot VARIANCE TO SECTION l004.02D4 02D4 (side yard adjacent a street) of the Roseville City Code to allow the construction of a 14 foot by 14 foot porch and 14 foot by 10 foot deck on to the west side of the principal structure to be placed 19 feet from the property line for Kara Rose, 998 Brooks Avenue, based on the findings of Section 5 and conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated February 23, 2004. Prepared by: Thomas Paschke (651-490-2236) Attachments: Location map, narrative, site plan, aerial photos, and resolution. PF3536 - ReA 022304 - Page 5 of 5