My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03536
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3500
>
pf_03536
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:05:43 PM
Creation date
6/29/2005 11:35:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3536
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
998 BROOKS AVE W
Project Name
CHARLES B & KARA K ROSE
Applicant
CHARLES B & KARA K ROSE
Status
Approved
PIN
112923230053
Date Final City Council Action
2/23/2004
Date Final Planning Commission Action
1/7/2004
Additional Information
PORCH AND DECK
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the <br />Rose request, recommending (5-2) approval of an 11 foot VARIANCE to Section 1004.02D4 of <br />the Roseville City Code, based on the findings of Section 5 and conditions of Section 6 of the <br />project report dated February 4,2004; <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Roseville City Council, to approve an <br />11 foot VARIANCE to Section 1004.02D4 of the Roseville City Code for Kara Rose, 998 <br />Brooks Avenue, subject to the following conditions: <br /> <br />1. The porch and deck being limited to a depth of 14 feet (addition from principal <br />structure towards property line adjacent Aglen Street) or an 11 foot encroachment <br />into the required 30 foot setback. <br /> <br />2. The parcel being limited to an impervious coverage of 4,115 sq. ft. <br /> <br />3. Gutters installed along the eves of the porch to direct roof drainage to the west or <br />north yard areas. <br /> <br />4. The deck must remain an open-air deck - in the future no enclosure of this deck <br />as a screen porch or expanded living area to the principal structure will be <br />permitted. <br /> <br />5. The review and approval of a building permit must be consistent with the <br />approved plans and variance. <br /> <br />6. A property survey including property lines, existing features and the proposal <br />may be required by the Building Official if adequate measurements cannot be <br />found to establish the limits of the 11 foot encroachment. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council <br />Member Maschka and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Ihlan, <br />Schroeder, Maschka, Klausing <br /> <br />and the following voted against: Kough <br /> <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.