Laserfiche WebLink
<br />become very problematic when attempting to retrofit additions to homes or add <br />accessory structures. Specifically, the EXISTING CITY CODE requires these <br />lots have a 30 foot front yard, comer street side yard, and rear yard setback and <br />either a 5 foot or 10 foot interior side yard setback. When applied to existing lots, <br />it becomes evident that little area is available for expansion needs/desires. The <br />Rose home was constructed prior to the adoption of Section 1004.02D4. Further <br />complicating matters is attempting to determine the front lot line/yard. The City <br />Code, Section 1002.02 Definitions, states: "Lot Line, Front: The boundary of a <br />lot which abuts a street, and in the case of a comer lot, it shall be the shortest <br />dimension on a public street. Should the dimensions be equal, the owner shall <br />designate the front yard for the record". This strict interpretation puts the parcel's <br />front lot line/yard adjacent to Aglen Street. However, generally speaking, most <br />individuals would conclude that the front lot line/yard on a comer lot is the street <br />frontage a principal structure faces (address). This interpretation/conclusion <br />results in Brooks Avenue being the front lot line/yard. These facts limit any <br />proposed structural modification without an approved deviation (variance) from <br />the City Code. The Community Development Staff has determined that the <br />plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not <br />created by the landowner. <br /> <br />C. The variance, if granted, wil/not alter the essential character of the locality: <br />The improvements proposed, a porch and deck addition, are living spaces similar <br />to those on homes from the same era. However, decks were typically addition <br />years after initial construction. The Community Development Staff has <br />determined that this variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character <br />of the locality, nor adversely affect the public health, safety, or general <br />welfare, of the city or adj acent properties. <br /> <br />6.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: <br /> <br />6.1 Based on the information provided and the findings in Section 5 ofthis project report, the <br />Community Development Staff recommends approval of an 11 foot VARIANCE to <br />Section 1004.02D4 (side yard adjacent a street) of the Roseville City Code for Kara <br />Rose to allow the construction of a 14 foot by 14 foot porch and 14 foot by 10 foot deck <br />on to the west side of the principal structure to within 19 feet of the property line at 998 <br />Brooks Avenue, subject to the following conditions: <br /> <br />a. The porch and deck being limited to a depth of 14 feet (addition from principal <br />structure towards property line adjacent Aglen Street) or an 11 foot encroachment <br />into the required 30 foot setback. <br /> <br />b. The parcel being limited to an impervious coverage of 4, 115 sq. ft. <br /> <br />c. Gutters installed along the eves of the porch to direct roof drainage to the west or <br />north yard areas. <br /> <br />PF3536 - RPCA 020404 - Page 4 of 5 <br />