Laserfiche WebLink
<br />in his known absence; <br />4. That we discussed the fact that John was also contemplating the <br />upgrade of his home and that there was a probability that he also would <br />need to apply for a variance ifhe chose to do an upgrade to his home; 5. That John had a <br />face to face visit with Kara Rose at their home <br />following the January 7th hearing (Mr. Rose left the room) and again <br />offered to work with her on this issue. The upshot of that meeting was <br />the posting of an undated letter in his front door the day that he <br />returned overseas: this letter ignores the happening of their earlier <br />visit. (Why?); <br />6. That some of the above may not be presented in open meeting that I <br />understand is televised; This is for security reasons, and for reasons <br />delineated in #1 above, and for no other reason. Ms Rose and Planning <br />Commission members are welcome to view this material. <br /> <br />Again, I am leaving shortly after noon tomorrow and I will attempt to <br />contact you before that time. Thank-you. <br /> <br />Respectfully, <br />Thomas J Berkner <br /> <br />CONTACT INFORMATION: <br /> <br />Thomas (Tom) Berkner <br />Box 194 <br />Lindstrom, Mn. 55045 <br /> <br />My most available phone number to reach me is: <br />651-307-0499 <br /> <br />3 <br />