Laserfiche WebLink
<br />WHEREAS, the Williams parcel has a current total impervious coverage of3,157 square <br />feet, which total complies with the 30% maximum coverage allowance; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Mr. Williams proposes to construct a 16 foot by 16 foot (256 sq. ft.) master <br />bedroom and bathroom addition to the horne, which addition would increase the total impervious <br />coverage for the parcel to 3,413 square feet or an overage of298 square feet from that which is <br />allowed by the City Code; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the <br />Williams variance request on February 5, 2003, and recommended (7-0) approval of the request, <br />based on findings outlined in Section 5 and conditions of Section 6 of the proj ect report dated <br />February 5, 2003. <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Roseville City Council, to grant John <br />Williams a 298 square foot variance to Section 1004.01A6 of the Roseville City Code to allow <br />construction of a 256 square foot master bedroom and bathroom at 1965 Chatsworth Street, <br />based on the findings in Section 5 and of the project report dated February 24,2003 and subject <br />to the following conditions: <br /> <br />a. All existing and proposed building and site improvements shall not exceed a <br />maximum impervious coverage of3,413 square feet. <br /> <br />b. The attached bedroom being limited to a maximum size of 256 square feet as <br />indicated on the site plan. <br />c. The bedroom addition to include a window along the north side of the structure <br />wall and gutters to properly direct roof drainage away from the east property. <br />The addition must match the existing building in color and/or materials. <br /> <br />d. The review and approval of a building permit consistent with the approved plans <br />and variance. <br /> <br />e. No additional accessory buildings or expansion to the garden shed is allowed. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council <br />Member Kysylyczyn and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Kough, <br />Klausing, Maschka, and Kysylyczyn <br /> <br />and the following voted against: None <br /> <br />Member Schroeder abstained. <br /> <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br /> <br />2 <br />