pf_03456 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Supplement to Setback Permit Application 2916 West Owasso Blvd. January 30, 2003 Narrative for the necessity of the setback permit The buildable area of the home is limited to a triangular area bounded by the 50' and 75' wetland and shoreline setback on the south side of the property, the 20' drainage and utility easement on the east side of the property and the 30' setback requirement at the propeliy front. Given the square footage desired in the design of the home the prospective homeowner determined that encroachment would be necessary upon one ofthe three requirements. Due to the nature of the preferred design, the garage was placed at the narrowest point in the aforementioned triangular area and considering the placement and necessity of the remaining components of the home the design was not feasible without encroaching upon the 30' setback requirement. Narrative for item 9 a. In compliance-no buildings ctmently exist on the site and the proposed stmcture contains a three-car garage. b. In compliance-the proposed project provides for a livable space where none existed. c. In compliance-the proposed project will enhance the terrain such that drainage runoff will be controlled by the nature of the design. d. In compliance-the current owner did not create the need for the setback permit. Instead, conditions such as wetland and shoreline setbacks necessitated the change to accommodate the proposed stmcture. e. In compliance-the total area of the property exceeds 38,000 square feet, while the proposed project including the garage and deck is approximately 3,800 square feet. f. In compliance-there is no other setback considerations. The perimeter of the project complies with all applicable codes. g. In compliance-the project improves the functionality of the site in that the plan contains the constmction of a residential site where none had previously existed. h. In compliance-the project consistently utilizes same exterior stmcture materials and colors. I. In compliance-the final building mass is consistent with the design of the contiguous properties. J. In compliance-the building expansion does not place more vehicles adjacent to first floor bedrooms of adjacent structures. k. In compliance-the drainage or roof gutters guide water away from the structure and adjacent structures. I. In compliance-the roof is properly proportioned to and integrated with the roof of the principle stmcture on the property.