My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03459
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3400
>
pf_03459
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:12:17 PM
Creation date
6/30/2005 11:50:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3459
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
1760 DUNLAP ST N
Project Name
BRIAN T & JILL M BEAN
Applicant
BRIAN T & JILL M BEAN
Status
Approved
PIN
152923440025
Date Final City Council Action
4/28/2003
Planning Files - Resolution #
10090
Additional Information
LIVING AREA & ATTACHED GARAGE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the <br />Bean variance request on April 2, 2003, and recommended (4-3) approval of the request, based <br />on findings outlined in Section 5 and conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated April 2, <br />2003. <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Roseville City Council, to grant Brian <br />Bean a 2 foot variance to Section 1004.02D5 (Dwelling Dimension - Side Yard Setback) of the <br />Roseville City Code to allow construction ofliving area and attached garage at 1760 Dunlap <br />Street, based on the findings in Section 5 and of the project report dated April 28, 2003 and <br />subject to the following conditions: <br /> <br />g. The proposed side yard addition (north) being limited to an encroachment of two <br />feet or to a point three feet from the property line. <br /> <br />h. The proposed front yard addition (west - attached garage) being limited to an <br />encroachment of 16 feet or to a point 24 feet from the front yard property line. <br /> <br />i. The additions must match or be of similar to that of the existing building in color <br />and/or materials. <br /> <br />j. Gutters and downspouts being placed along the eve of the additions were <br />appropriate to properly direct roof drainage onto the subject parcel and away from <br />neighboring properties. <br /> <br />k. Windows being placed along the west building wall of both additions to break-up <br />the long mass. <br /> <br />1. The review and approval of a building permit consistent with the approved plans <br />and variance. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council <br />Member Kough and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Klausing, <br />Maschka, Schroeder, Kough and Kysylyczyn <br /> <br />and the following voted against: None <br /> <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.