Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br /> <br />a. Plannilll! File 3464: Request by Roland Gisvold, 970 Transit Avenue, for <br />an 18 foot VARIANCE to Section 1004.02D5 (Yard Requirements - <br />Front Yard Setback) to allow construction of a 22 foot deep by 20 foot <br />wide attached garage addition on to the home. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Mulder opened the hearing and requested City Planner Thomas Paschke <br />provide a summary of the project report dated May 7, 2003. <br /> <br />Mr. Paschke indicated that Roland Gisvold, 970 Transit Avenue, submitted an application <br />seeking approval of a variance to construct a 20 foot wide by 22 foot deep (440 sq. ft.) <br />attached garage addition on to the north side of his home. The proposed addition would <br />encroach 15.5 feet into the front yard requiring a variance to Section 1004.02D5 - <br />Dwelling Dimensions Front Yard Setback, and be 14.5 feet from the right-of-way line <br />requiring a variance from Section 602.02, Parking on Boulevard Prohibited. Thomas <br />Paschke illustrated the setbacks with diagrams and pictures. <br /> <br />The Community Development staff recommends approval of the 15.5 foot variance to <br />Section 1004.02D5 (Dwelling Dimensions - Front Yard Setback) and a variance to <br />Section 602.02 (Parking on Boulevard Prohibited) of the Roseville City Code for Roland <br />Gisvold allowing the construction of a 20 foot wide by 22 foot deep attached garage at <br />970 Transit Avenue, subject to the following conditions: <br /> <br />a. The proposed front yard addition (north) is limited to an encroachment of a <br />distance not to exceed 15.5 feet or to a point no closer than 14.5 feet from the <br />front yard property line._ The garage can be designed with a west facing door and <br />a new "L" shaped drive is possible, without parking in the boulevard. <br />b. The addition matches or is to be similar to that of the existing building in color <br />and/or materials. <br />c. Gutters and downspouts are placed along the eve of the additions where <br />appropriate to properly direct roof drainage onto the subject parcel and away from <br />neighboring properties. <br />d. Windows be placed along the north and east building wall to break-up the long <br />mass. <br />e. The review and approval of a building permit consistent with the approved plans <br />and variance. <br /> <br />Member Traynor asked if the current garage would become living space. (No, storage <br />space). Thomas Paschke explained parking in driveway versus boulevard. He explained <br />options for on-site parking. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Mulder asked if Transit is planned to be widened. (No plan). <br /> <br />Vice Chair Mulder asked if there is City liability for having a car parked in the <br />Boulevard. (No added liability). <br />