Laserfiche WebLink
<br />the required setback (side or rear yard), but this location would be within the <br />down slope of the yard; require additional fill; add length to the structures <br />foundation; require additional length to the driveway/impervious coverage, and <br />require a Setback Permit in order to provide the required 6 foot separation from <br />structured required by the City Code. The Community Development staff has <br />reviewed the existing (immediate) site conditions, grading plan and survey to <br />determine if there is a reasonable solution that supports the variance requested. <br />Based on our review of the existing situation on the Berger lot and the existing <br />drainage, slopes, and retaining the existing landscape conditions of the parcel and <br />adjoining parcel, staff has concluded that the most practical and reasonable <br />location is 42 feet from the front property line as indicated in the proposal. <br />Based on our analysis of the situation the Community Development Staff has <br />determined that the property can be made more livable, reduce garage door <br />mass along the street, minimize drainage impacts and slope encroachment, <br />minimize additional impervious surface, and can be put to a reasonable use <br />under the official controls, if a variance is granted. <br /> <br />B. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not <br />created by the landowner: Victoria Street parcels are older parcels with above <br />normal depth (185 feet), with homes build 50 feet or more from front property <br />lines, and the Berger parcel also has a steep slope which moves in a northwesterly <br />direction which creates design and drainage challenges if constructed at the <br />required location. These facts limit any proposed structural modifications or <br />detached structure without an approved deviation (variance) from the City Code. <br />The Community Development Staff has determined that the plight of the <br />landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the <br />landowner (structure placement prior to code, lot width, and topographic <br />issues). <br /> <br />C. The variance, if granted, wil/not alter the essential character of the locality: <br />The improvements proposed are consistent with how construction activity and <br />building permits have been issued in the past for this neighborhood. Further, Mr. <br />Berger's detached accessory structure will be set back 42 feet from the property <br />line adjacent Victoria Street while the home to the north is setback 30 feet from <br />the Victoria Street properly. The Community Development Staff has <br />determined that this variance, if granted, will not alter the essential <br />character of the locality, nor adversely affect the public health, safety, or <br />general welfare, of the city or adj acent properties. <br /> <br />6.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: <br /> <br />6.1 Based on the infonnation provided and the findings in Section 5 of this project report, <br />staff recommends approval of a VARIANCE to Section 1004.0 1A 7 of the Roseville City <br />Code for Kenneth Berger, allowing the construction of a detached accessory building in <br />the front yard, 15.73 feet from the principal structure and 42 feet from the front property <br />line for property located at 3036 Victoria Street, subject to the following conditions: <br /> <br />PF3465 - RPCA 05/07/03 Page 4 of 5 <br />