My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03476
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3400
>
pf_03476
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:14:51 PM
Creation date
7/1/2005 9:20:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3476
Planning Files - Type
Zoning Text Amendment
Address
475 MINNESOTA AVE W
Project Name
VIETNEMESE BUDDHIST ASSOC.
Applicant
VIETNEMESE BUDDHIST ASSOC.
Status
Approved
PIN
122923310095
Additional Information
VITENAMESE STUPA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION <br /> <br /> <br />val: <br /> <br />DATE: 11/13/00 <br />ITEM NO: C-l <br /> <br />Managet l}. proved: Agenda Section: <br />/" CONSENT <br /> <br />A request by J ames Westby to reaffirm approval of a roadway easement <br />vacation and a minor subdivision for 480 Lovell Avenue. (PF2642) <br /> <br />1.0 REQUESTED ACTION <br /> <br />1.1 James Westby has requested the City Council reaffirm approval of action taken in 1994 <br />that vacated a roadway easement and approved a two lot minor subdivision. <br /> <br />2.0 BACKGROUND <br /> <br />2.1 On May 231 1994 the RoseviUe City Council approved the vacation of an unnecessary <br />roadway easement. However, the Council retained the former roadway easement area as <br />a utility and drainage easement. At the same meeting the City Council also approved the <br />division of a platted lot and former road easement into two lots. <br /> <br />2.2 Resolutions for the roadway easement vacation exist from the 1994 approval. However1 <br />these documents were never recorded with Ramsey County. Thus the roadway easement <br />vacation expired six months after the Council's approval. <br /> <br />2.3 Similarly, the lot division was never recorded actually creating the two lots from the <br />single lot and vacated roadway easement and this action also expire six months after the <br />Council's approval. <br /> <br />3.0 STAFF FINDINGS <br /> <br />3.1 It is not uncommon for requests to expire and seek reaffirmation from the City Council. <br /> <br />3.2 In the case of the request (PF2642) by Mr. Westby, it appears neither the vacation or <br />minor subdivision was ever followed through by either the applicant or the City. <br /> <br />3.3 The Engineering Department has reviewed the previous action by the City Council and <br />has indicated they support the reaffirmation request. <br /> <br />3.4 The Community Development staff has reviewed the previous lot division and discussed <br />the action with Mr. Westby to determine whether the former action is consistent with his <br />current intentions. The Community Development staff has concluded that the lot division <br />meets all applicable City Codes and is consistent with Mr. Westby's current proposal. <br /> <br />Reaffirmation PF 2642.doc Page I of2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.