pf_03481 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

8.2 The Commission had a number of questions for staffregarding the proposed project. The Commission attempted to separate the issues for those pemlissible under the City Code and those that required a variance. The Commission also discussed options and whether all aspects of the request were reasonable and practical. 8.3 The Planning Commission voted (6-0) to recommend approval of a VARIANCE to Section 1004.01A6 (Maximum Total Surface Area) of the Roseville, based on the findings in Section 5 and conditions in Section 6, except that condition "D" (The front entry porch (covered entry) being setback a minimum of21.5 feet from the front property line and being limited to a size of 90 square feet) be eliminated. 8.4 The Planning Commission voted (6-0) to recommend denial ofa VARIANCE to Section 1004.02D5 of the Roseville City Code based on the findings that reasonable and practical options are available that would not necessitate the need for a variance; that the plight was a result of the land owner's proposal; and that the proposed front porch addition did alter the essential character of the locality. 8.5 Based on the action of the Planning Commission the City Planner with the assistance of the applicants representative reevaluated and modified the V ARIANCE to Section 1004.01A6 (reduced) from that which was requested at the Commission's June 4,2003 hearing. Specifically, the porch has been eliminated (IS sq. ft) and the pool reduced from 400 sq. ft (staff calculation) to 332 sq. ft. (applicant's proposal). These changes create a reduction in a variance, stated at 585 sq. ft, to a variance totaling an increase in impervious coverage for the parcel of 5.2% or 466 sq. ft. 8.6 The Staff defers to the Planning Commission's recommendations. 9.0 SUGGESTED CITY COUNCIL ACTION: 9.1 ADOPT A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL of a 466 square foot (5.2%) V ARIANCE to Section 1004.01A6 (Maximum Total Surface Area) of the RoseviHe City Code for Sylvia Seferman, 420 Terrace Drive, based on the findings in Section 5 and conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated June 16, 2003; 9.2 ADOPT A RESOLUTION DENYING an 8.5 foot VARIANCE to Section 1004.0205 (Dwelling Dimensions - Front Yard Setback) based on findings of fact, and as recommended by the RoseviUe Planning Commission. Prepared by: Thomas Paschke (651-490-2236) Attachments: Location map, narrative, site plan, aerial photo. PF348 I - ReA 06/16/03 - Page 9 of 9