Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2) that it is reasonable and practical to allow a 22 foot by 22.5 foot (500 sq. ft.) <br />addition on to the existing home. Home improvements and additions are highly <br />supported and encouraged by the Housing Section of the Comprehensive Plan and <br />allow residents to increase living area and a home's value. The proposed addition <br />could be improved without the need for a variance, but other items in the overall <br />improvement plan would need to be eliminated; 3) that it is reasonable and <br />practical to allow the reuse of existing patio pavers. This type of landscape <br />improvement in also encouraged by the Comprehensive Plan and is encouraged <br />by Staff where appropriate, reasonable, and practical. To eliminate existing <br />pavers would be wasteful; whereas their reuse can enhance the property and their <br />intermittent placement, will create green area between most of the blocks to assist <br />with infiltration, reducing drainage off-site. 4) that it is reasonable and practical to <br />allow the future installation of a 332 square foot in-ground pool. Improvements <br />of this nature are amenities to the home owner and have limited impacts; 5) that it <br />is reasonable and practical to allow an increase in impervious coverage on this <br />parcel totaling 466 square feet. The Sieferman parcel is afforded a 30% threshold <br />of 3,340 square feet of impervious coverage, which amount could afford the <br />parcel the family room addition without the need for a variance or other formal <br />action. However, eliminating/or reducing components of the proposed <br />improvements including the driveway, deck, pavers, and pool unnecessarily <br />restrict the size allowed for the family room. The Community Development <br />Staff has determined that the property can be made more livable and put to <br />a reasonable and practical use under the official controls, if the variance to <br />impervious area and front yard setback are granted. <br /> <br />B. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances ullique to the property not <br />created by the landowner: Although the Sieferman parcel (l0,973) is slightly <br />below the minimum lot/parcel size prescribed by the City Code (11,000), the <br />uniqueness of this parcel is its limited ability to offer living area improvements <br />other than a second story, due to the existing impervious area on the parcel (3,011 <br />square feet) directly associated with the detached garage and extended driveway. <br />The Sieferman parcel has a detached two stall garage and extended driveway <br />typical of a 1950 rambler. However, this situation (detached rear yard accessory <br />building) is not the norm for the neighborhood. Only 8 of the 79 homes that lie <br />along Judith, Terrace Drive, and Centennial Drive have detached garages in rear <br />yards. The other homes all have attached single or two stall attached garages that <br />cover less ground area with impervious area. This is a unique condition for the <br />Sieferman parcel as well as the 7 others, creating limited expansion options for <br />the 8 residents. Further, prior to 1999, homes through Roseville were not <br />required to meet a 30% impervious coverage requirement. That being said, a <br />majority of the properties in Roseville developed in the 1940's, 1950's and <br />1960's face challenges when attempting to make improved living conditions or <br />add to their investment, either because of setback constraints or limited lot <br />coverage. The Community Development Staff has determined that the plight <br />of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created <br />by the landowner (site improvements prior to code change). <br /> <br />PF3481 - ReA 06/16/03 - Page 5 of 8 <br />