My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03482
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3400
>
pf_03482
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:15:49 PM
Creation date
7/1/2005 11:10:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3482
Planning Files - Type
Setback Permit
Address
562 HEINEL DR W
Project Name
BRENT G &
Applicant
PATRICIA A JORDAHL
Status
Approved
PIN
012923230013
Additional Information
GARAGE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Section 9 includes 12 site conditions. Brent Jordahl has circled 8. The following circled items are not in compliance. <br /> <br />Section 9, item g. The proposed project improves the aesthetics, covered storage, or the functional use of the site. <br /> <br />We disagree. The layout of the contiguous lots are long and narrow; approximately 85 ft. wide by 150 ft. deep. The narrow width of <br />the lot is not conducive to the addition of a third garage, adjacent to the side of the existing two car garage. The only three car garage <br />on contiguous/adjacent lots was added to the rear of the existing garage for this reason. This garage addition was done by <br />Mr. Jordahl's adjacent neighbor on the opposite side. Mr. Jordahl may not have approved of his neighbor entering the easement to <br />make a side garage addition.. <br /> <br />Section 9, Item i. The final building mass is consistent with that on contiguous properties. <br /> <br />We disagree. The distribution of the building mass is going to be elongated on the garage side. The distance between structures as a <br />result is less than on contiguous properties. The proposed garage would cause an alley like appearance between the houses. <br /> <br />Section 9, Item j. The building or driveway expansion/addition does not place more vehicles adjacent to living quarter first floor <br />bedrooms of adj acent structures. <br /> <br />We disagree. The proposed driveway extension places vehicles significantly closer to our first floor bedroom. <br /> <br />Section 9, Item k. The drainage and roof gutters guide water away from the structure and adjacent structures. <br /> <br />This is a MAJOR disagreement. The proposed project diagrams from Sussel Corp. do not show overhangs or gutters in relation to the <br />lot line. In very heavy rain, the water overload, (with this plan) would drop from the roof (which extends over our lot line) onto our <br />property. No drainage plans were submitted. If current drainage methods, -extensions to the cutters-, are "the plan" , these <br />extensions will be beyond the proposed footage and the water will flow directly on our property. <br /> <br />Survey. A very narrow, loose, string imbedded in the grass and extending the fhll150 ft. length of the lot has been used by Mr. <br />Jordahl for weeks to mark the lot line. When it broke, it was simply repositioned to a more convenient spot. Using this string as a <br />guideline, stakes were positioned to mark the area for the new construction. This string has a built in bias that depends on who is <br />using it. It can vary as much as two feet in the 150 ft length and still look straight. The beginning and end points are also in question. <br />All plans in this area should be validated by a survey. <br /> <br />The conclusion to this application by Mr. Jordahl mentions his need to house his collector car, however an additional workshop is also <br />in the plans. The reason he has to build it in the easement area is so he does not damage HIS landscaping and sprinkling system. <br />Better to ruin the neighbors and put them at risk. Future utility plans by the city would forcefully be on our property as very little if <br />any of the easement on their property would remain. <br /> <br />We respectfully request this application be denied and further plans be monitored closely. <br /> <br />Thank you <br /> <br />Kurtis G. Viggers and <br />586 Heinel Dr. <br />Roseville MN. 55113 <br /> <br />/. /;1 ~./ _.1 <br />_---"7 ,c'1~ . j . _ I <br />- ---~,... ~9'/ <br />.-~.- -~/ / '/", -- ;' / <br />. '1.-d-=-_:::~~_ /~' ~ / ./ <br />/" -".". /( 1 ~"./j <br />bara A. Willett . . <br /> <br />k f/vJ~1 ~r!) ~ <br /> <br />Page 2 of2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.