My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03482
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3400
>
pf_03482
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:15:49 PM
Creation date
7/1/2005 11:10:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3482
Planning Files - Type
Setback Permit
Address
562 HEINEL DR W
Project Name
BRENT G &
Applicant
PATRICIA A JORDAHL
Status
Approved
PIN
012923230013
Additional Information
GARAGE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />Date: May 20, 2003 <br /> <br /> <br />To: Thomas Paschke <br />City Planner <br />2660 Civic Center Dr. <br />Roseville, MN. 55113 <br /> <br />From: Kurtis Viggers and Barbara Willett (husband and wife) <br />586 Heinel Dr. <br />Roseville, MN. 55113 <br /> <br />Re: Setback Permit Application - by Brent GalY Jordahl <br />Dated: May 9,2003 <br />For: 562 Heinel Dr. <br />Roseville, MN. 55113 <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Paschke, <br /> <br />This letter serves as documentation that Kurtis Viggers and Barbara Willett (owners of the adjacent property -South East) of the <br />proposed garage addition at 562 Heinel Dr., by Gary Jordahl, object to the easement. We find the submitted drawings to understate <br />the intrusion of the easement, ignore drainage areas and issues, overlook the unsightly ally that is being created between these two <br />homes in an otherwise well proportioned neighborhood, uses questionable lot line markings and totally ignores the negative impact <br />and potential devaluation of the property at 586 Heinel Dr.. <br /> <br />Brent and Pat Jordahl have been our neighbors for over 15 years. We have a neighborly relationship and until the garage addition, no <br />disagreements. They maintain their property and show care. For this particular process however, we were not approached as to the <br />impact of their plans. The drainage issue is so apparent that by visual inspection alone, one can see where all the water currently <br />drains -directly on our property. The placement of their home is higher than ours, the grade of the landscaping is down, toward our <br />property and we all know which way water travels. This is a HUGE issue for us. In 2001 we had a major water problem in the first <br />level of our split entry. Most of the problem was concentrated on the wall adjacent to the Jordahl property and proposed addition. <br />This problem had been persistent in bad weather throughout the years. All attempts at landscaping and minor actions failed. So, in <br />2001 we did a major reconstruction of the first level to repair damage and alleviate the stress of water on this area. The following is <br />an approximation that can be backed up by receipts and reflects the money spent on this project, but does not reflect our time, effort <br />and frustration. <br /> <br />Drain tile - $3,550. <br /> <br />Commercial gutters - $2,200. Ceramic tile - $11, 800. <br /> <br />Lumber, paint, labor -$2,000. <br /> <br />Close to $20, 000.00 was needed to upgrade our home to withstand the pressure of the CURRENT drainage situation, any additional <br />disturbing of this area between our houses, especially the sought after easement is highly risky and posses an enormous about of <br />pressure on an already fragile system. <br /> <br />We have reviewed Jordahl's setback permit application and have the following disagreements with the application. <br /> <br />Section 8, item C. A setback permit shall not reduce the accessory structure side or rear yard required setback by more than <br />70% or be closer than three (3) feet to a property line. <br /> <br />· The setback permit includes a house diagram with the proposed garage. The diagram does not include the roof overhang of <br />approximately 3 feet. The permit includes a front elevation diagram that includes a roof overhang that is approximately 3 feet but <br />disregards this footage in its calculation from the lot line. <br />· Gutters should be included. The gutters would add approximately 6 inches. The combination of roof overhang and gutters <br />sets the proposed garage over our lot line. This does not meet Section 8, item C requirements. <br /> <br />Page 1 of2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.