Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Attachment for Side Setback permit. Tim Garvin <br /> <br />9) <br />B. Additional space would be utilized more frequently with roof vs. an uncovered deck. <br />('/r<.. 'rile covered structure \vould allow LIS to LIS gutters to control water runoff and <br />move thiS water away from Ollr structure. <br />E:. A large portion of our lot will still relnall1 <br />front froln side to side. back is 65 feel III <br />slcle is 19 i reel. <br />F;'. Not to Iny knO\vleclge <br />C;. A covered cleck aesthetically would be more appealing vs. an uncovered cleek. <br />II. 'The shingles will be the saine as the house. the siding will be screened. <br />.I. Docs not adcllnore vehicles <br />L. The roof will be a gable roof with the s,une pitch. <br /> <br />()ur dimensions are 102 Feet in the <br />, left side is 135 feet I and the right <br /> <br />10) <br />B. 'rom Kiriand <br />1808 Alta Vista Dr <br /> <br />D. This permit is required for the roof \ve would like to put over our deck. We arc <br />planning on adding a cleek that will be 4-5 feet from our property line. This would fall <br />too close to the line if we added a roof. We t'eel a roof would enable us to screen in the <br />deck making it more usable, increase privacy, and improve the appearance. We feel the <br />neighborhood would also benefit from the privacy and appearance. <br /> <br />II. Please contact me and I will make <br />Review Committee meeting. <br /> <br />dfolt to be present for the Development <br />