Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />PLA1'fHIlfG REPORT <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />11 July 1984 <br />1511-84 <br /> <br />CASE NUMBER: <br /> <br />APPLICANT. <br /> <br />Patrick W. Goff <br /> <br />LOCATION: <br /> <br />North of Fernwood. at Rose Place <br />(West of Mobile Home Park) <br /> <br />A:tION REQUESTED" <br /> <br />Approval of Preliminary Plat <br />Special Use Permit for PUD Approval <br />Vacatlon of Rlght-of-Way <br /> <br />PLANNING CONSIDIRATIOHS~ <br /> <br />1. Thi. parcel of land 11 at tbe west end of the mobile home park, located <br />vut of Lexington Avenue and south of the Burlington Northern railroad <br />tr.cks. It is a 3.19 acre track and is zoned R-2.. The applicant b <br />requesting approv41 of 23 townhouse unit. on the .ite. The property to <br />the east l' zoned B-3, and of COurse. is now occupied by the mobile home <br />court which bas been there .ince the village was formed. <br /> <br />Acce.. to the property it via the extenaion of Fernwood. Rose Place is <br />platted 60 feet wide along the south side of the property. but is not <br />constructed. To the touth there are aingle family homes, and therf. are <br />single family homes to the west across the pond which occupies a portion <br />of the property on the west side. Attached is 4 survey submitted by the <br />applicant Indicated lot d1mensions, the pond, and the Rose Place <br />right-of-way. ' <br /> <br />2. the property was zoned R-2 perhap. 12-14 years ago at which time it was <br />proposed to extend Fernwood with a public street and cul-de-sac near the <br />north central portion of the property. A total of nine lot. would appear <br />to be possible to be platted on the property. The property though <br />approved for development for duplexes did not proceed. There are <br />basically two problems with attempting to plat the land into duplex lot.. <br />One is that the property is not quite wlde enough to make the lots work <br />well inulllUch as the 120 foot diameter required cul-de-.ac takes up a <br />great deal of space near the center of tbe property. Secondly, the lots <br />on the eal.:t side would have back yards oriented toward the mobile home <br />court whi.:~ did not represent an aesthetic asset, particularly in those <br />days when there were far fewer treee on the property. <br /> <br />the density vould allOY a total of 24 unlt. on the property in accordance <br />with the R-2 density. Rowever, we suggested to the applicant that one <br />Unl.t be removed near the southwest corner so as to create a more open <br />enVlronment at the entranc! to the site (northeast of the cul-de-sac). <br /> <br />3. One of the advantages of a PUD in this case is that the units can be <br />oriented away from the mohile home court due to the flexibility of the PUD <br />and the handllng of circolatlon and access wlth a private street system. <br />The applicant proposes to construct a cul-de-sac at hlS expense whlch will <br />provide the proper turn-around faclhty for Fernwood Street which now <br />