My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_1208
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_1208
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2015 3:06:43 PM
Creation date
1/7/2015 4:14:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
12/8/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, December 8,2014 <br /> Page 11 <br /> would be cost; but opined that it would prove a relatively low investment com- <br /> pared to other city costs and investments. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte sought information on her previous request for infor- <br /> mation on where the former "Roseville University" was at; and expressed her in- <br /> terest in continuing that process of engaging and education residents. Coun- <br /> cilmember Laliberte expressed her disappointment that the course had not been <br /> offered for over a year, since she considered it so effective. <br /> Member Gardella advised that "Roseville U" came up in task force recommenda- <br /> tions a lot and had been considered a successful structure for community engage- <br /> ment. However, Member Gardella stated that she understood that the City was re- <br /> thinking or tweaking it and therefore, the CEG didn't pursue it much at this time. <br /> Chair Grefenberg noted that, in the CEG report, they recommended resumption of <br /> "Roseville U." <br /> Member Gardella further noted that the CEG had some specific recommendations <br /> as part of reformatting"Roseville U." <br /> Councilmember Laliberte opined that she would like to see it reinstated sooner ra- <br /> ther than later. <br /> Councilmember Willmus concurred that "Roseville U" was a great program and <br /> offered his support in bringing it back. However, Councilmember Willmus ad- <br /> vised that one critique he'd heard was the length of time or number of sessions <br /> required to finish it; with many residents unable to make that long of a commit- <br /> ment. Councilmember Willmus suggested tightening up that schedule to avoid <br /> fallout from the current program. <br /> Member Becker noted that a "Mini Roseville U" had been one consideration of <br /> the CEG. <br /> Regarding neighborhood associations, Councilmember McGehee suggested there <br /> may be different views of them depending on the personalities involved or the <br /> way they came to be. Councilmember McGehee questioned if the role of the <br /> CEG was to assist the process other than in facilitating the neighborhoods self- <br /> identifying themselves and coming forward to express their interest in forming. <br /> Councilmember McGehee noted that, efforts from various neighborhood associa- <br /> tions had been somewhat thwarted in the past when they came forward seeking <br /> neighborhood signage to identify themselves, and previous City Councils had re- <br /> jected those requests. <br /> Chair Grefenberg noted that signage was included in the CEG report. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.