Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ROSEVILLE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION <br />MEETING NOTES FOR DECEMBER 2, 2014 <br />ROSEVILLE CITY HALL ~ 6:30pm <br />PRESENT: <br />Bogenholm, Diedrick, Doneen, Gelbach, Stoner <br />ABSENT: <br />Azer, D. Holt, M. Holt, Newby, and Wall notified staff about being unable to attend <br />STAFF: <br />Anfang, Brokke <br />NOTE: <br /> Lack of quorum at this meeting <br />INTRODUCTIONS <br />1. <br />ROLL CALL/PUBLIC COMMENT <br />2. <br />No Public comment <br />APPROVAL OF MINUTES – NOVEMBER 6, 2014 MEETING <br />3. <br />Minutes for the November 6, 2014 Parks & Recreation Commission meeting were not voted on <br />due tolackof a quorum. <br />REVIEW JOINT MEETING with the CITY COUNCIL <br />4. <br />Vice Chair Diedrick summarized the recent Council update. <br />Commission representatives discussed Roseville Deer population, Community Center <br />consideration, Cedarholm Golf Course, Volunteer Participation. <br />Diedrick commented that the meeting started off with the feeling that the Council were <br />expecting the entire Commission to be present rather than a representation of membership. <br />Commissioners discussed possibilities for future updates. <br />o <br />Diedrick reported on the Deer Population discussion; <br />based on Council discussion, a small group of Commissioners need to gather <br />o <br />further information and report back findings. <br />Gelbach volunteered to decipher Council minutes and outline references for <br />Commission to discuss at an upcoming meeting. <br />Gelbach suggested adding action steps to the report. Gelbach will add <br />action steps to his review of Council questions. <br />Diedrick’s review of the Community Center included; <br />Did not appear to be a hot topic. Further discussions are probably 12 or more <br />o <br />months out. <br />Council asked for a project plan. The project plan would be a tool, giving direction <br />o <br />when the Council does decide to move forward. <br />Plan might include funding mechanisms, components, involve community, <br />referendum direction. <br />Diedrick’s Golf Course report included; <br />The Council had a number of questions and referenced an action plan. <br />o <br />Brokke spoke to the Cedarholm CIP and the need for future improvements. <br />o <br />Due to the age of the structures, there is the potential for structural issues <br />down the road. <br />Currently the facilities are safe, clean and functional. <br />Commissioners discussed developing a use analysis involving Golf Course <br />staff; <br />Look at fund and fund balance <br />Look at Capital needs <br />Golf Course staff to report to Commission at an upcoming meeting <br /> <br />