Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, November 17, 2014 <br />Page 5 <br />1 Councilmember Willmus noted that a Community Center was specifically and <br />2 separately identified in and throughout the Parks Master Plan process and sup- <br />3 ported by the public for continue discussion and consideration. Councilmember <br />4 Willmus noted that past discussions had been primarily limited to potential part- <br />5 nership with Roseville Area Schools, and suggested such a partnership could still <br />6 be pursued, whether through land, space, or simply the long tradition of working <br />7 cooperatively (e.g. gymnastics center). Councilmember Willmus expressed his <br />8 curiosity seeing how the new park buildings would fulfill the need and role for <br />9 gathering spaces, and should prove an interesting component to the overall picture <br />10 as they came on line. In monitoring that, and what was learned from the Cities of <br />11 Shoreview and Maplewood, and their operating deficits, Councilmember Willmus <br />12 opined that the public’s comfort level could then be further determined. Coun- <br />13 cilmember Willmus opined that, just like community centers in other cities, the <br />14 need to determine the public’s willingness to expend dollars for such a facility <br />15 was something that needed consideration, but cautioned that he was not yet ready <br />16 to rush out and state that the City of Roseville had to have a community center. <br />17 <br />18 Councilmember Etten agreed that a combined effort by the City and School Dis- <br />19 trict could prove beneficial for both parties, as well as the community; even <br />20 though it meant there were more people involved who had to come to an agree- <br />21 ment and work out the details, such as where and when, which should be possible <br />22 with leaders working together as a whole. Councilmember Etten noted that this <br />23 type of facility was substantially different than those being constructed in area <br />24 parks, and as residents had recently asked him, there remained a need for a facility <br />25 to meet the needs from little children to the elderly. While in agreement with <br />26 many of the comments made by his colleagues, Councilmember Etten opined that <br />27 he was not ready to jump into the pool yet. <br />28 <br />29 With recent financial obligations undertaken by the City with Park Renewal Pro- <br />30 gram improvements and bonding, as well as utility and infrastructure improve- <br />31 ment upgrades and costs, Mayor Roe opined that right now he had little interest in <br />32 adding anything additional for taxpayers right now. However, Mayor Roe noted <br />33 the continuing comments he heard from residents about the things we still don’t <br />34 have in the community from the standpoint of a community center, and therefore, <br />35 it seemed a reasonable approach was to determine a timeframe when such a facili- <br />36 ty would and could make sense (e.g., if a local sales tax option was considered). <br />37 Mayor Roe suggested options, including how to adjust timing, should all be part <br />38 of the process; and to him, it seemed it was important to have key things in place <br />39 before moving forward, including the actual steps in the process, who to talk to, <br />40 and when those preliminary conversations should occur. Mayor Roe suggested <br />41 that the Commission move from the initial interested expressed by the community <br />42 in the Park Master Plan process as a starting point, including areas of interest in <br />43 such a facility, and then seek further feedback from the community to determine <br />44 their current level of support in pursuing a community center. Mayor Roe noted <br />45 the many different concepts for a community center, but also noted the need for a <br /> <br />