My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-01-06_PR Comm Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Packets
>
2015
>
2015-01-06_PR Comm Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2015 9:10:29 AM
Creation date
1/8/2015 9:05:06 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, November 17, 2014 <br />Page 3 <br />1 <br />Deer Population in Roseville <br />2 <br />3 <br />Commissioner Stoner advised that the Commission was seeking direction from <br />4 <br />the City Council on specific issues with managing the deer population; with the <br />5 <br />Commission to -date only exploring preliminary information on the logistics and <br />6 <br />process for a managed hunt in Roseville. Commissioner Stoner noted that <br />7 <br />considerable more discussion and direction would be needed prior to pursuing <br />8 <br />that option, with the range of population densities of the deer in areas city-wide <br />9 <br />and not only in one area. Commissioner Stoner offered to bring additional <br />10 <br />information, including costs, control mechanism, and other options back to the <br />11 <br />City Council if that was their direction. <br />12 <br />13 <br />Councilmember Willmus noted that a neighborhood group had previously <br />14 <br />expressed interest in some method of control; and noted the great deal of <br />15 <br />comment on this subject that he'd heard during his recent campaign door <br />16 <br />knocking, and confirmed that the deer population was not necessarily confined to <br />17 <br />one area of Roseville, but remained an area of concern for residents. <br />18 <br />Councilmember Willmus expressed his personal interest in finding out more <br />19 <br />about how other communities responded to the deer population problem, <br />20 <br />including their successful and/or non -successful methods, measures, and the <br />21 <br />possibility of partnering with other communities in the area experiencing the same <br />22 <br />problem regionally, not just jurisdictionally. Councilmember Willmus supported <br />23 <br />the Commission taking a look at the problem and providing options to the City <br />24 <br />Council. <br />25 <br />26 <br />Councilmember McGehee expressed her personal and definite opposition to a <br />27 <br />bow hunt within limited open space in Roseville; noting that this was not a <br />28 <br />Roseville -specific deer herd, but area -wide, and more tracking data and <br />29 <br />information would be helpful, such as from the Cities of Little Canada and <br />30 <br />Shoreview. Councilmember McGehee also suggested more information from the <br />31 <br />Commission on how the City could help residents having considerable issues with <br />32 <br />deer devouring their plantings, since the issue seemed to be less about vehicles <br />33 <br />and accidents and more about eating shrubs or plantings. Councilmember <br />34 <br />McGehee suggested some type of herd management option with less deadly <br />35 <br />results. <br />36 <br />37 <br />Councilmember Etten expressed his interest in hearing a variety of methods; and <br />38 <br />stated he could support bow and arrow hunting as that seemed to be a safe and <br />39 <br />successful in other metropolitan communities, such as Little Canada. <br />40 <br />Councilmember Etten also expressed interest in polling other municipalities to <br />41 <br />hear results of their deer herd population control methods, both positive and <br />42 <br />negative results. <br />43 <br />44 <br />Councilmember Laliberte spoke in support of determining the actions and results <br />45 <br />of other metropolitan communities, and their current or ongoing programs. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.