Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />- <br />Case Number: 964.76 <br />April 7, 1976 <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />v <br />,,/ <br />~ <br /> <br />Page Two <br /> <br />1. <br />~ <br />h <br />'f <br />~ <br />.t- <br />f <br /> <br />4. A variance is requested to the density requirement 1n as much as no <br />specific density standards for housing for the elderly are establ~shed <br />in the ordinance. The ordinance requ1res 21000 square feet of land <br />for a one bedroom un)t and 2,800 sq~are feet of land for a two bed- <br />room unit. A credit of 300 square feet per unit 1S provided for <br />parking underground or below the building. These standards are <br />appropriate and have been successful in Roseville for the typical <br />apartment project (not including exclusive elderly units). land area <br />required according to the ordinance for the 214 units would be 469,600 <br />square feet. The land area required for the family housing units <br />(92 townhouses) would be 2?5.600 square feet. The land area of the <br />nine acres is 392,040 squar'e feet. Thusl the land area devoted to <br />the senior citizens housing is 166,440 square feet. A typical density <br />standard for senior citizens housing would be 1,000 square feet per <br />unit. On this basis. 822 units proposed in the structure would require <br />122,000 square feet leaving us approximately 44,000 square feet in excess <br />of that standard which is the equivalent to slightly w~re than an acre. <br /> <br />5. The proposed design provides one garage plus one open parking space <br />for each of the 92 townhouse units as required by ordinance. The 122 <br />senior citizens units are provided with 24 garages and 39 open spaces <br />equaling 63 parking spaces or slightly more than ~ park1ng space per <br />unit. The commonly excepted standard for senior cltlzens housing <br />in urban areas is ~ parking space per unit. We suggest. however. that <br />one-half space per unit is more appropriate for th1S specific location not <br />currently on a high.level service transit line. We would anticipate the <br />parking spaces provided to be adequate for the proposed dev~lopment. <br /> <br />6. The special use pennit is required for multiple structures over three <br />stories in height in this City. In this case, the permit is requested <br />for seven stodes for which the front yard setback requirement would <br />be three-quarters of the height which would be approximately 50 feet. <br />The proposed setback is 60 feet. The remaining building do not exceed <br />three stories and meet or exceed the requ1red setback requirements. <br />The purpose for requiring a special use permit for structures over three <br />stories was to control the sltuation where such higher structures might <br />be contiguous to single family homes or some develop~ent that might <br />suffer aesthetically as a result. In this case. the contiguous properties <br />to the north and to the south are zoned co~~rcial and the properties <br />across from Snelling A/enue are of course zoned for cow.mercial development <br />as well. The nearest single family h~~s are approX1Mately two blocks <br />away to the north and east with the Church. Ralph Reeder EleMentary <br />Schuo 1. ano sorr>e of the three st::lry tmmhollse lInl ':5 ~'':!t','l~pn the nome,> <br />and the proposed seven story un1t site. <br /> <br />7. The overall development plan 1S subJect to a special use permit for <br />approval of the "planned unit develupl'1entll. This of course, covers <br />the layout of the buildings, parking arrangement, access drives, building <br />materials. and use of color. exter10r massing. provlsions for utilities, <br />landscape design. and grading. large scale drawings of the planned unit <br />development covering these ele~ents will be presented at the hearing. <br />The staff has ~~t nu~erous tiw~s with the developer and with their <br />architects reviewing elements of these plans. Final calculatlons <br /> <br />.J <br />,';. <br /> <br />J <br />