pf_01504 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

e e PLAIlWtftC UPOiT DATE: 6 June 1984 CASE NUMBER: 1504-84 APPLICANT: Rich.rd C. Robbin. LOCATION: E..t of Vie tori. Street. Northerly of Woodhill Drive (we.t .hore of L.ke Ow...o) ACtION REQUESTED: Speci.l U.e Permit for Pl.nned Unit Development PLAntRC COlfSIDllRATIOlfS: 1. The property in que.tion i. approximately a 0.62 acr& tract lying between Victoria Street and L.ke Owano with the frontage of 201.24 faet On Victori.. Thi. property i. occupied by a r~ther old duplex, . marin.. and a .ingle family hClll\e. The current land ownen, Mr. and Hn. Richard Robbin. proro.e to build a new g.r.ge on the .ite which would be 22 feet by 24 feet. The gtr.ge i. located 6 feet from the home .nd nore th.n 75 feet !rom th~ l.ke.hore. Thu.. the g.r.ge rapre.ent. DO problem in te~ of it. .pecific location rel.tive to the bOUle or the lakuhore. The g.r'ge i. .1.0 more th.n .dequately .et back from Victoria Street. 2. The problem with thb alee is th.t there are. of coune. a number of principal b-uilding. .nd Ute.. ROleville t. Zoning Code like mo.t zoniDl codu in tbi. country allow one princ!pd building per lot. A greater number of princip.l building. and/or .cce.sory buildings ~an be .pproved through the procel' of a Pl.nned Unit Development (PUD). Th.t. of c~ur.e. i. one of the principal purpo.e. for . PUD proce.. in the Ordinance. The other complication that need not be leriou. with rupect to thi. property is the fact that the existing duplex exi.t. parti.lly aD the public right-of-way for Victoria Street. According to the City'. normal policy (.imil.r to other communities in the .re.) Wh~n . plat i. filed, or . PUD i. filed, addition.l right-of-way contiguou. to major thoroughfare. is requested at that time. In this cue. an .dditional 10 feet for Victoria Street it required. Such a dedication 41 a condition to the approv.l of the PUD will. of cour.e. place the exi.ting duplex further into the right-of-way that now exist.. Repre.entativel of the County have indicated to the Engineering Department lhat they regard thi. II no particular problem. The dedic.tion can be made, and the building can continue to exi.t .. it ha. in the pa.t. 3. The marina has been operatlng in the ana for m.sny yeau and WII functioning at the time the new zoning map. and Zoning Cnde was .dopted in Harch of 1959. We aSlume it h.. been operating continuously .ince though we .re not certain ot that point. In any ca.e. it would appear th.t the marina c.n continue to operate al a non-conforming u.e (the land i. zoned single family). It should be clear, however. that ehe non-conforming statu. of the property i. not changed by the approval of a PUD providing for the additio'l of an acceuory structure (in this case, the propo.eiJ garage) .