Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-..;.. ~ <br /> <br />e <br /> <br /> 1. <br />, <br />'. <br /> 2. <br />! <br /> 3. <br />e <br /> <br />, <br />:> <br />~ <br />~~ ~ <br /> <br />" <br />~ <br /> <br />f <br />"':.f~ <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />~ <br />, <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />-, <br />, <br /> <br />f- <br />}^ e <br />.(..... ~ <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br />ee <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />CASE NO: 359-66 <br /> <br />AP?UCANT: KIOitermc:m Reohy <br /> <br />tCCA.;C~t, Sw~:=. :=:~! ~!~r.v.t'ry' AA nod Cteveland Aven....e <br /> <br />AOION REQUeSTED- Approval of special use fo. plaflned U'lit c1evelopmet'lt <br /> <br />PlANNING CONSIDERATIONS: <br /> <br />The basic pion hQ$ been reviewed many tll'lle~ with the Commis!'ion o.-.d the repre- <br />~ntQtives of the neighborhood wring the process of the rezo"ing of the property <br />in question. The plan ncIW proposed for approval is the some os that represented <br />during the zoning heoring.. <br /> <br />In additicn to the basic plan, the applicant has nctH submitted elevations of the <br />exterioo of the proposed ::.portment structures and t~e townhovS-es. In addition, <br />the ~Iiconl hO!. ;)fepared Q l:mCscope plo." and a utili:ies rlan, a portIon of <br />which appecn not to have been pior.ed down as of r"is writing. <br /> <br />In discu!oSing tile proposed building pions witll the opplicQl'\t, we have ocImonished <br />him to prepare the de-sigflS in Q manner so 0> to be C;)fTlpahble with the residential <br />c.horac.t-'r that exisls in the orea. rf,e pION submitted indicate two Msigm for <br />the townhouses. Each gloop of townho.JSei weuld be constructed to be consistent <br />within elKh building. That is to say, there would not 6e Q variety of tmtnhouse <br />dt!signs in the same stNctvre. The two designs presei"ted we feel h:.,..." comiderabl~ <br />merit, and would, in fact, appear to be c~ctible with tlte residential chotecter <br />in the area. <br /> <br />... The "t'lities quettion referred to earlier, whkh appears not to have lJeen fully <br />solved at this poine, .s thot of the pl!rmiuio", to corf)' storm water along fue east <br />side of tt.e property tOo the north drail"oge ditch on Highway 36. We urderstond <br />from discuuions with the app"cQnt'~ COn:.uItOflts thc;t they expect written perl'l\is. <br />sion and ~e completion of Q design from the Highway DepOl'tl1lCnt prior to the <br />Plcr.ning Commission heorifl9 on this qtJ~ti()l'l. It h hoped that this proposol cor; <br />be resolved i'l time for the Engll'ICer to orcperiy reIJlew it ar.d ih relatiO"lShip tOo <br />the overall drainage Olld utility plan. <br />