My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01867
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1800-1899
>
pf_01867
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2024 12:47:05 PM
Creation date
7/22/2005 6:40:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1867
Planning Files - Type
Special Use Permit
Address
2755 LEXINGTON AVE N
Project Name
LEXINGTON AVENUE LTD. PARTNERSHIP
Applicant
GEORGE REILING
Status
Approved
Date Final City Council Action
9/12/1988
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
461
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />~~ <br />t~ <br /> <br />. I <br /> <br />1 '... . ~ 1; , i~/ <br />-V ,~~ <br /> <br />JUly 19. 1968 <br /> <br />ReI proposed Can-American Lexington project <br /> <br />TOI City counoll .eabers and plannlng coaalss10n member. <br /> <br />We realize that the land owner and dftTeloper Ihould be able <br />to bu11d on their property. But why apart.lnt.? <br /> <br />W. .us!e.t that each counol1 member Tlsit apartmeRts th8~ art <br />2S to 45 year. old and then des1de 1f thi. ls the lesaor ~hat <br />you want to leaTe for the futare of RoseTllle to our &hl1dren <br />and srandehl1drluI <br /> <br />In .hecklng out the older apartments we think that you wl1l <br />t1nd a hlt;hpr trl.. rate 14 tho". areas. (Checlt wl th other po- <br />llee de~rt.ents.) <br /> <br />There art many thin!. that could be built ~uch a. townhouses <br />etc. These would give 1..ed1ate tax reyenuf,' to the city. <br /> <br />It they ar~ 9.110wed to build as requested I where does the <br />additional money come fro2 tor polioe-flre protection. Also. <br />street ..1ntenance. etc. <br /> <br />It they haTe a seven year tax exempt status ~~y should the <br />eltizens of ROI.Tl1~e pay for these additlonal serTices with <br />Tary little benefit to them? <br /> <br />SlowlY but surely your turnln~ HoseTl11e lnto another Mpls. <br />with all It, problems. Blg~er ~s not betterl The quality of <br />life has declined dra.atlcallr OTer the past 20 years. <br /> <br />We belleTe it is clear. it 1s ObTlous. that one-thousand <br />people IiTlng on such a saall slte wl11 cause a host of prob- <br />lems for the bulk ot the populat.ioR of RoseTll1a. <br /> <br />Don't underectlmate how important an issue this is to us. <br />Don't underestl.ate how intensely we feel about this hlgh den- <br />slty deTelopment. Come election tlae. W. wl11 rea~.ber. <br /> <br />Thls 1. not a petitl~n, but the opln1on of many RoseTl11e Tax <br />payers. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.