pf_01867 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

.. t,.. -2- ~ Acted upon by plnnning commioslon (if applIca~le) on September 7. 1988 ~ Approved by governing bodYI contingent upon Metropolitan Council review, on September 12, 1988 Considered but not approved ~Y governing body on Other E. Indicate wnat adjacent local governmmtal units affected by the change have been ser.~ cople~ of tho plan amendment and the date{s) co~le~ were ~ent to them. Notification of affected adjacent governmental unit" is requIred for' major plan amer.dments. Shorevlew. Arden Hills. New Brlahto~. St. Anthonv. HlnneaQolls. St. Paul Lauderdale Falcon Hel ht~ Ha lewood Little Canada R~msey County - sent 11 1 Because of the coaprehens\ve nature of most major plan amendments, a sUlllmAl'y checklist is more useful to ensure that the amendment is ~olllplete for Council review and to determine whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the metropolitan systems plans or other chapters of the Metropolitan Development Gutde. Please indicate whether the amendment affects the follow1ng factors. Where it do!s, the materials submitted must fully address the issue(s). II. IMf'ACT ON REGIONAL SYS-:EMS A. Sewers 1. Change In city'S year 2000 flow project~ons. ~ NolNot Applicable. Yes. 2. COl::Cun1t1 discharges to lllore than one metropolitan interceptor. X NolNot Applicable. ---- Yes. Indicate which interceptor will be affected by the ---- amendment. D. Transportation 1. Relationship to Council policies regarding ~etropol1tan h1ghways. X No/Not Applicable. ---- Yes. 2. Change 1n type and 1nten~ity of land uses at interchange~ and other locations within a quarter-mile of the metropolitan highway system? ~ tlo/Not Applicable. Yes. l ~-. ;, ,'I " . . ( ~, . ,. , ,.