My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03424
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3400
>
pf_03424
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2011 9:40:50 AM
Creation date
8/8/2005 12:10:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3424
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
2525 County Rd C2
Project Name
McCloskey, Susan
Applicant
McCloskey, Susan
Status
Approved
PIN
052923230073
Date Final City Council Action
9/23/2002
Planning Files - Resolution #
10036
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />feet of pavement to the impervious coverage creating a total impervious coverage of 5,200 <br />square feet or 35% coverage; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the <br />McCloskey variance request on September 4, 2002, and recommended (7-0) approval of the <br />request, based on findings outlined in Section 5 and conditions of Section 6 of the project report <br />dated September 4,2002. <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Roseville City Council, to grant Susan <br />McCloskey an 800 square foot (5%) variance to Section 1004.01A6 of the Roseville City Code <br />based on the findings in Section 5 of the project report dated September 23,2002, and subject to <br />the following conditions: <br /> <br />a. All building and site improvements shall not exceed 5,200 square feet of <br />impervious area. Contractor must verify exact square footage of driveway <br />connection. <br /> <br />b. The review and approval of a building permit consistent with the approved plans <br />and variance. <br /> <br />c. The installation of a landscape hedge along the drive connection. Said <br />landscaping must be located outside of the 30 foot by 30 foot Traffic Visibility <br />Triangle. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council <br />Member Klausing and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Maschka, <br />Klausing, Kough, Schroeder, Kysylyczyn <br /> <br />and the following voted against: None <br /> <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.